Abara Winston, Wilson Sacoby, Vena John, Sanders Louisiana, Bevington Tina, Culley Joan M, Annang Lucy, Dalemarre Laura, Svendsen Erik
Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Satcher Health Leadership Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA.
Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 27;11(6):5684-97. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110605684.
Community engagement remains a primary objective of public health practice. While this approach has been adopted with success in response to many community health issues, it is rarely adopted in chemical disaster response. Empirical research suggests that management of chemical disasters focuses on the emergency response with almost no community engagement for long-term recovery. Graniteville, an unincorporated and medically underserved community in South Carolina was the site of one of the largest chlorine exposures by a general US population. Following the immediate response, we sought community participation and partnered with community stakeholders and representatives in order to address community-identified health and environmental concerns. Subsequently, we engaged the community through regular town hall meetings, harnessing community capacity, forming coalitions with existing local assets like churches, schools, health centers, and businesses, and hosting community-wide events like health picnics and screenings. Information obtained from these events through discussions, interviews, and surveys facilitated focused public health service which eventually transitioned to community-driven public health research. Specific outcomes of the community engagement efforts and steps taken to ensure sustainability of these efforts and outcomes will be discussed.
社区参与仍然是公共卫生实践的主要目标。虽然这种方法在应对许多社区卫生问题时已成功采用,但在化学灾害应对中却很少采用。实证研究表明,化学灾害管理侧重于应急响应,几乎没有社区参与长期恢复。南卡罗来纳州一个未合并且医疗服务不足的社区格兰尼特维尔是美国普通民众最大规模氯气暴露事件的发生地之一。在立即响应之后,我们寻求社区参与,并与社区利益相关者和代表合作,以解决社区确定的健康和环境问题。随后,我们通过定期的市政厅会议让社区参与进来,利用社区能力,与教堂、学校、健康中心和企业等现有的当地资源结成联盟,并举办健康野餐和筛查等全社区活动。通过讨论、访谈和调查从这些活动中获得的信息促进了有针对性的公共卫生服务,最终转变为社区驱动的公共卫生研究。将讨论社区参与努力的具体成果以及为确保这些努力和成果的可持续性而采取的步骤。