Medical Faculty, Institute for Occupational and Social Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Mar;84(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0539-x. Epub 2010 May 5.
To determine whether the occupational exposure of hairdressers to permanent hair dyes can be quantified by the use of biological monitoring of urinary aromatic diamines as one of the main constituents and to compare these levels to those recently determined in persons after personal application of hair dyes.
Fifty-two hairdressers (40 female and 12 male) from 16 hairdresser salons in and around the city of Aachen took part in this field study. Subjects were asked to document all operations associated with possible exposure to permanent hair dyes like mixing colour, application of colour, washing after dyeing, and cutting of freshly coloured hair. Excretion of aromatic diamines 2,5-toluylene diamine (2,5-TDA) and p-phenylene diamine (p-PDA) as main constituents of commercially available hair dyes was measured in urine samples using a highly specific and accurate GC/MS-method. Urine samples were taken at 5 points of time during the work week: pre-shift before the start of the work week, pre- and post-shift on the third day of the work week and finally pre- and post-shift on the last day of a work week in order to meet different workloads and possible accumulative effects over the week. Nineteen persons matched for age served as a control group and gave spot urine samples.
Although the levels were generally low, we could determine a significantly higher internal exposure to 2,5-TDA in hairdressers (medians ranged from <0.2 μg/g creatinine up to 1.7 μg/g creatinine at various sampling times, with a maximum of 155.8 μg/g creatinine) compared to the control group (median <0.2 μg/g creatinine, maximum 3.33 μg/g creatinine). At the same time, p-PDA was detectable only in selected cases in the group of hairdressers but not in the control group. Overall, there was neither an intra-shift effect seen nor an effect across the work week. There was also no significant difference in urinary excretion of participants who reported wearing protective gloves compared to those who reported not wearing protective gloves.
The internal exposure to aromatic diamines in hairdressers using permanent hair dyes can be determined using biological monitoring. The extent of exposure is low compared to subjects after personal application of hair dyes, who excreted more than 200 times higher amounts of aromatic diamines. This slight work-related exposure might be reduced by the strict adherence to the use of suitable gloves as well as long-sleeved clothing.
确定美发师职业性接触永久性染发剂中芳香二胺(主要成分之一)是否可以通过尿中芳香二胺的生物监测来定量,并将这些水平与最近个人使用染发剂后确定的水平进行比较。
本现场研究纳入了来自亚琛市及其周边地区 16 家美发沙龙的 52 名美发师(40 名女性和 12 名男性)。研究对象被要求记录所有可能接触永久性染发剂的操作,如混合颜色、涂抹颜色、染发后洗发以及刚染完头发的修剪。使用高度特异性和准确的 GC/MS 方法,在尿样中测量芳香二胺 2,5-甲苯二胺(2,5-TDA)和对苯二胺(p-PDA)作为市售染发剂的主要成分的排泄量。在工作周的 5 个时间点采集尿样:工作周开始前的班前、工作周第 3 天的班前和班后、工作周最后一天的班前和班后,以适应不同的工作量和可能的周累积效应。19 名年龄匹配的人员作为对照组,提供单次尿样。
尽管水平普遍较低,但我们发现美发师的 2,5-TDA 内暴露量明显更高(各采样时间中位数范围为<0.2μg/g 肌酐至 1.7μg/g 肌酐,最高为 155.8μg/g 肌酐),与对照组相比(中位数<0.2μg/g 肌酐,最高为 3.33μg/g 肌酐)。同时,在美发师组中仅在一些情况下可检测到 p-PDA,但在对照组中则无法检测到。总体而言,未观察到班内效应或工作周内效应。报告戴防护手套的参与者与报告未戴防护手套的参与者的尿中芳香二胺排泄量无显著差异。
使用永久性染发剂的美发师的芳香二胺内暴露量可以通过生物监测来确定。与个人使用染发剂后的受试者相比,接触量较低,后者排泄的芳香二胺量高出 200 多倍。通过严格遵守使用合适的手套和长袖衣物,这种轻微的职业相关暴露可能会减少。