Suppr超能文献

全基因组关联研究中的复制

Replication in genome-wide association studies.

作者信息

Kraft Peter, Zeggini Eleftheria, Ioannidis John P A

机构信息

Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Sci. 2009 Nov 1;24(4):561-573. doi: 10.1214/09-STS290.

Abstract

Replication helps ensure that a genotype-phenotype association observed in a genome-wide association (GWA) study represents a credible association and is not a chance finding or an artifact due to uncontrolled biases. We discuss prerequisites for exact replication; issues of heterogeneity; advantages and disadvantages of different methods of data synthesis across multiple studies; frequentist vs. Bayesian inferences for replication; and challenges that arise from multi-team collaborations. While consistent replication can greatly improve the credibility of a genotype-phenotype association, it may not eliminate spurious associations due to biases shared by many studies. Conversely, lack of replication in well-powered follow-up studies usually invalidates the initially proposed association, although occasionally it may point to differences in linkage disequilibrium or effect modifiers across studies.

摘要

重复验证有助于确保在全基因组关联(GWA)研究中观察到的基因型-表型关联代表一种可靠的关联,而不是由于未控制的偏差导致的偶然发现或假象。我们讨论了精确重复验证的先决条件;异质性问题;跨多个研究的不同数据合成方法的优缺点;重复验证中的频率论与贝叶斯推断;以及多团队合作带来的挑战。虽然一致的重复验证可以大大提高基因型-表型关联的可信度,但它可能无法消除由于许多研究共有的偏差而产生的虚假关联。相反,在有足够效力的后续研究中缺乏重复验证通常会使最初提出的关联无效,尽管偶尔它可能表明不同研究之间连锁不平衡或效应修饰因子的差异。

相似文献

1
Replication in genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究中的复制
Stat Sci. 2009 Nov 1;24(4):561-573. doi: 10.1214/09-STS290.
5
Calibration of credibility of agnostic genome-wide associations.不可知全基因组关联的可信度校准。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008 Sep 5;147B(6):964-72. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30721.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Robust Inference for Federated Meta-Learning.联邦元学习的稳健推理
J Am Stat Assoc. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2024.2443246.
3
Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies.全基因组关联研究分析
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2885:695-715. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4306-8_34.

本文引用的文献

3
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的重新评估。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.
8
Meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies.全基因组关联研究中的荟萃分析。
Pharmacogenomics. 2009 Feb;10(2):191-201. doi: 10.2217/14622416.10.2.191.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验