Department of Health Sciences and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 19;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-44.
Pricing strategies are mentioned frequently as a potentially effective tool to stimulate healthy eating, mainly for consumers with a low socio-economic status. Still, it is not known how these consumers perceive pricing strategies, which pricing strategies are favoured and what contextual factors are important in achieving the anticipated effects.
We conducted seven focus groups among 59 residents of deprived neighbourhoods in two large Dutch cities. The focus group topics were based on insights from Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations Theory and consisted of four parts: 1) discussion on factors in food selection; 2) attitudes and perceptions towards food prices; 3) thinking up pricing strategies; 4) attitudes and perceptions regarding nine pricing strategies that were nominated by experts in a former Delphi Study. Analyses were conducted with Atlas.ti 5.2 computer software, using the framework approach.
Qualitative analyses revealed that this group of consumers consider price to be a core factor in food choice and that they experience financial barriers against buying certain foods. Price was also experienced as a proficient tool to stimulate healthier food choices. Yet, consumers indicated that significant effects could only be achieved by combining price with information and promotion techniques. In general, pricing strategies focusing on encouraging healthy eating were valued to be more helpful than pricing strategies which focused on discouraging unhealthy eating. Suggested high reward strategies were: reducing the price of healthier options of comparable products (e.g., whole meal bread) compared to unhealthier options (e.g., white bread); providing a healthy food discount card for low-income groups; and combining price discounts on healthier foods with other marketing techniques such as displaying cheap and healthy foods at the cash desk.
This focus group study provides important new insights regarding the use of pricing strategies to stimulate healthy eating. The observed perceptions and attitudes of residents of deprived neighbourhoods can be integrated into future experimental studies and be used to reveal if and how pricing strategies are effective in stimulating healthy eating.
定价策略常被提及是一种刺激健康饮食的潜在有效工具,主要针对社会经济地位较低的消费者。然而,目前尚不清楚这些消费者如何看待定价策略,他们更喜欢哪些定价策略,以及在实现预期效果方面哪些情境因素很重要。
我们在荷兰两个大城市的贫困社区进行了七组焦点小组讨论,每组讨论由 59 名居民参加。焦点小组的主题基于罗杰斯创新扩散理论的见解,包括四个部分:1)讨论食品选择因素;2)对食品价格的态度和看法;3)想出定价策略;4)对专家在之前的德尔菲研究中提名的九种定价策略的态度和看法。使用 Atlas.ti 5.2 计算机软件进行分析,采用框架方法。
定性分析表明,这组消费者认为价格是食品选择的核心因素,他们面临购买某些食品的经济障碍。价格也被认为是刺激更健康食品选择的有效工具。然而,消费者表示,只有将价格与信息和促销技术相结合,才能产生显著效果。一般来说,鼓励健康饮食的定价策略比抑制不健康饮食的定价策略更有价值。建议的高回报策略包括:降低健康食品的价格,同时保持与不健康食品的可比性(例如,全麦面包比白面包);为低收入群体提供健康食品折扣卡;将健康食品的价格折扣与其他营销技术相结合,例如在收银台展示便宜又健康的食品。
本焦点小组研究为利用定价策略刺激健康饮食提供了重要的新见解。贫困社区居民的观察到的看法和态度可以纳入未来的实验研究中,以揭示定价策略在刺激健康饮食方面是否有效,以及如何有效。