Department of Health Studies, Physical Education, and Human Performance Science, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA.
Obes Facts. 2010;3(2):117-26. doi: 10.1159/000302794. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of a multi-component intervention to reduce kinesiology pre-professionals' implicit and explicit bias.
A pre-post experimental design, which consisted of an experimental group (n = 42) and a control group (n = 36), was conducted to assess the efficacy of the intervention using both implicit and explicit obesity bias measures.
On the pre-test, participants did not display overall explicit bias on the Anti-Fat Attitudes Test (AFAT) but had strong implicit bias and bias on the lazy/motivated semantic differential scale. Participation in the intervention reduced explicit bias on the AFAT social character disparagement and weight control/blame subscales but not implicit bias.
Implicit bias remains difficult to change and appears to be deep-seated in individuals' minds. Future interventions may need methods to make sure all participants process and connect emotionally to all information.
本研究旨在评估一种多组分干预措施对减少运动机能学专业准从业者内隐和外显偏见的效果。
采用前后测实验设计,对实验组(n=42)和对照组(n=36)进行干预,采用内隐和外显肥胖偏见测量来评估干预效果。
在预测试中,参与者在反肥胖态度测试(AFAT)上没有表现出总体外显偏见,但具有强烈的内隐偏见和在懒惰/有动机语义差异量表上的偏见。参与干预减少了 AFAT 社会特质贬低和体重控制/指责分量表上的外显偏见,但没有减少内隐偏见。
内隐偏见仍然难以改变,而且似乎在个体的思维中根深蒂固。未来的干预措施可能需要采用方法,确保所有参与者都能感性地处理和联系所有信息。