Liao Xiaomei, Zucker David M, Li Yi, Spiegelman Donna
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Biometrics. 2011 Mar;67(1):50-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01423.x.
Occupational, environmental, and nutritional epidemiologists are often interested in estimating the prospective effect of time-varying exposure variables such as cumulative exposure or cumulative updated average exposure, in relation to chronic disease endpoints such as cancer incidence and mortality. From exposure validation studies, it is apparent that many of the variables of interest are measured with moderate to substantial error. Although the ordinary regression calibration (ORC) approach is approximately valid and efficient for measurement error correction of relative risk estimates from the Cox model with time-independent point exposures when the disease is rare, it is not adaptable for use with time-varying exposures. By recalibrating the measurement error model within each risk set, a risk set regression calibration (RRC) method is proposed for this setting. An algorithm for a bias-corrected point estimate of the relative risk using an RRC approach is presented, followed by the derivation of an estimate of its variance, resulting in a sandwich estimator. Emphasis is on methods applicable to the main study/external validation study design, which arises in important applications. Simulation studies under several assumptions about the error model were carried out, which demonstrated the validity and efficiency of the method in finite samples. The method was applied to a study of diet and cancer from Harvard's Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS).
职业、环境和营养流行病学家常常对估计随时间变化的暴露变量(如累积暴露或累积更新平均暴露)与慢性病终点(如癌症发病率和死亡率)之间的前瞻性关联感兴趣。从暴露验证研究中可以明显看出,许多感兴趣的变量在测量时存在中度到显著的误差。尽管普通回归校准(ORC)方法在疾病罕见且暴露为时间独立点暴露时,对于校正Cox模型中相对风险估计的测量误差大致有效且高效,但它不适用于随时间变化的暴露情况。通过在每个风险集中重新校准测量误差模型,针对这种情况提出了一种风险集回归校准(RRC)方法。给出了使用RRC方法对相对风险进行偏差校正点估计的算法,随后推导了其方差估计,得到了一个三明治估计量。重点在于适用于主要研究/外部验证研究设计的方法,这种设计在重要应用中会出现。在关于误差模型的几个假设下进行了模拟研究,结果表明该方法在有限样本中具有有效性和效率。该方法应用于哈佛大学健康专业人员随访研究(HPFS)中的饮食与癌症研究。