BACCN National Board, Benchmark Communications, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4HZ, UK.
Nurs Crit Care. 2010 May-Jun;15(3):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00392.x.
Since 1967 the gold standard for nurse staffing levels in intensive care and subsequently critical care units has been one nurse for each patient. However, critical care has changed substantially since that time and in recent years this standard has been challenged. Previously individual nursing organisations such as the British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) and the Royal College of Nursing have produced guidance on staffing levels for critical care units. This paper represents the first time all three UK Professional Critical Care Associations have collaborated to produce standards for nurse staffing in critical care units. These standards have evolved from previous works and are endorsed by BACCN, Critical Care Networks National Nurse Leads Group (CC3N) and the Royal College of Nursing Critical Care and In-flight Forum.
The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the much more detailed document 'Standards for Nurse Staffing in Critical Care', which can be found on the BACCN web site at www.baccn.org.uk. The full paper has extensively reviewed the evidence, whereas this short paper provides essential detail and the 12 standard statements.
Representation was sort from each of the critical care associations. The authors extensively reviewed the literature using the terms: (1) critical care nursing, (2) nursing, (3) nurse staffing, (4) skill mix, (5) adverse events, (6) health care assistants and critical care, (7) length of stay, (8) critical care, (9) intensive care, (10) technology, (11) infection control.
Comprehensive review of the evidence has culminated in 12 standard statements endorsed by BACCN, CC3N and the Royal College of Nursing Critical Care and In-flight Forum. The standards act as a reference for nursing staff, managers and commissioners associated with critical care to provide and support safe patient care.
The review of the evidence has shown that the contribution of nursing can be difficult to measure and consequently support nurse staffing ratios. However, there is a growing body of evidence which associates higher number of registered nursing staff to patient ratio relates to improved safety and better outcomes for patients. The challenge for nurses is to produce accurate and meaningful outcome measures for nursing and collect data that accurately reflect the input of nursing on patient outcomes and safety.
自 1967 年以来,重症监护和随后的危重病护理单元的护士人员配备标准一直是每位患者一名护士。然而,自那时以来,重症监护已经发生了重大变化,近年来这一标准受到了挑战。以前,个别护理组织,如英国危重病护理护士协会(BACCN)和皇家护理学院,已经为危重病护理单元的人员配备制定了指导方针。本文代表了所有三个英国专业危重病协会首次合作制定危重病护理单元护士人员配备标准。这些标准是从前人的工作中发展而来的,并得到了 BACCN、危重病网络国家护士负责人小组(CC3N)和皇家护理学院危重病和飞行论坛的认可。
本文旨在概述 BACCN 网站上可以找到的更详细的文件“危重病护理人员配备标准”。全文广泛审查了证据,而本文则提供了必要的详细信息和 12 个标准陈述。
从每个危重病协会中寻求代表。作者广泛审查了文献,使用了以下术语:(1)危重病护理、(2)护理、(3)护士人员配备、(4)技能组合、(5)不良事件、(6)卫生保健助理和危重病、(7)住院时间、(8)危重病、(9)重症监护、(10)技术、(11)感染控制。
对证据的全面审查最终形成了 BACCN、CC3N 和皇家护理学院危重病和飞行论坛认可的 12 项标准陈述。这些标准可作为与危重病相关的护理人员、管理人员和专员的参考,以提供和支持安全的患者护理。
对证据的审查表明,护理的贡献难以衡量,因此难以支持护士人员配备比例。然而,越来越多的证据表明,注册护士与患者比例越高,与患者安全和更好的结果相关。护士面临的挑战是为护理工作制定准确和有意义的结果衡量标准,并收集准确反映护理对患者结果和安全的投入的数据。