Tyson R L
Int J Psychoanal. 1991;72 ( Pt 1):39-44.
The Oedipus complex is indeed a central organizing focus of human development. Given the opportunity to review psychoanalytic work illustrative of how this concept influences clinical theory and technique, patches of common ground and of significant differences are described. The patient discussed was in the termination phase of a very long analysis, resulting in a concentration and telescoping of the three weeks of reported material from six months prior to termination. This facilitated the elucidation of similarities and differences in viewing and handling manifestations of resistance, transference and countertransference. In particular, differences in conceptualization of the Oedipus complex were addressed, especially the constraints imposed on the analyst's thinking and technique by an obligatory perception that all material represented oedipal themes. In an alternative view, a pre-oedipal, dyadic developmental foundation provides a framework for the elaboration and evolution of oedipal, triadic complexities as a developmental achievement. This enables a reconsideration of transference manifestations of conflictual object relations in terms of distinctions between dyadic, pre-oedipal and triadic, oedipal themes, thus enhancing the analyst's interpretive relevance.
俄狄浦斯情结确实是人类发展的一个核心组织焦点。有机会回顾说明这一概念如何影响临床理论和技术的精神分析工作时，会描述出一些共同点和显著差异。所讨论的患者处于一个非常漫长分析的结束阶段，这使得来自结束前六个月的三周报告材料得以浓缩和精简。这有助于阐明在看待和处理阻抗、移情和反移情表现方面的异同。特别是，探讨了俄狄浦斯情结概念化方面的差异，尤其是一种强制性观念给分析师的思维和技术带来的限制，即认为所有材料都代表着俄狄浦斯主题。另一种观点认为，前俄狄浦斯期的二元发展基础为作为一种发展成就的俄狄浦斯期三元复杂性的阐述和演变提供了一个框架。这使得能够根据二元、前俄狄浦斯期和三元、俄狄浦斯期主题之间的区别，重新思考冲突性客体关系的移情表现，从而增强分析师解释的相关性。
