University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Sep 1;111(1-2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 May 26.
Pictorial representations of specific environments related to smoking can evoke robust craving to smoke, even in the absence of any proximal cues to smoke (e.g., cigarettes, lighters). To evaluate the salience of smoking environment cues, we developed a novel procedure for bringing smokers' real world smoking and nonsmoking environments into the laboratory to compare them with standard (i.e., not personalized) environments within a cue-reactivity paradigm. Seventy-two smokers used digital cameras to take pictures of the environments in which they do and do not smoke. They then completed a cue-reactivity session during which they viewed and rated pictures of smoking and nonsmoking environments, half personal and half standard, all devoid of proximal smoking cues. As hypothesized, personal environments led to a significantly larger smoking-nonsmoking difference in craving, compared with the standard environments. Personalization also enhanced stimuli vividness, relevance, positive affect, and excitement, as well as heart rate changes from baseline. Implications of these findings for exposure-based research and treatment for addiction, as well as other psychological disorders, are discussed.
与吸烟有关的特定环境的图像表示即使在没有任何吸烟的近距线索(例如香烟、打火机)的情况下,也能引起强烈的吸烟欲望。为了评估吸烟环境线索的显著性,我们开发了一种新的程序,将吸烟者的真实世界的吸烟和非吸烟环境带入实验室,以便在线索反应性范式中与标准(即非个性化)环境进行比较。72 名吸烟者使用数码相机拍摄他们吸烟和不吸烟的环境的照片。然后,他们完成了一个线索反应性测试,在此期间,他们观看并对吸烟和非吸烟环境的照片进行了评分,其中一半是个人化的,一半是标准化的,所有照片都没有近距吸烟线索。正如假设的那样,与标准环境相比,个人环境导致了更大的吸烟-不吸烟欲望差异。个性化还增强了刺激的生动性、相关性、积极情绪和兴奋感,以及与基线相比的心率变化。讨论了这些发现对基于暴露的成瘾研究和治疗以及其他心理障碍的影响。