• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科团队合作:功能恢复计划中临床医生的经验。

Transdisciplinary teamwork: the experience of clinicians at a functional restoration program.

机构信息

Centre of Research Expertise in Improved Disability Outcomes, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9247-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-010-9247-3
PMID:20514510
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This research explored the experience of clinicians during the transition from working as an interdisciplinary team to providing a transdisciplinary model of care in a functional restoration program (FRP) for clients with chronic disabling musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

This qualitative study used a grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis. In depth interviews were conducted to gather data and analysis was performed by the coding of emergent themes.

RESULTS

Three major themes were identified that contributed towards building a successful transdisciplinary team: the client population; opportunities for communication with colleagues; and an organizational structure that supports transdisciplinary teamwork.

CONCLUSIONS

Transdisciplinary teams with multiple health care providers are suitable for treating patients with complex needs and with injuries that are chronic in nature. However, transdisciplinary teamwork requires input from an organizational level and from a communication level to effectively contribute to both clinician satisfaction and to improved coordination in patient care.

摘要

简介

本研究探讨了临床医生在从跨学科团队工作向功能恢复计划(FRP)中提供跨学科护理模式的转变过程中的体验,该 FRP 针对的是患有慢性致残性肌肉骨骼疼痛的客户。

方法

这项定性研究使用扎根理论方法进行数据收集和分析。通过深入访谈收集数据,并通过对新兴主题进行编码来进行分析。

结果

确定了三个主要主题,这些主题有助于建立一个成功的跨学科团队:客户群体;与同事沟通的机会;以及支持跨学科团队合作的组织结构。

结论

具有多个医疗保健提供者的跨学科团队适用于治疗具有复杂需求和慢性性质的损伤的患者。但是,跨学科团队合作需要组织层面和沟通层面的投入,才能有效地为临床医生的满意度和改善患者护理的协调做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Transdisciplinary teamwork: the experience of clinicians at a functional restoration program.跨学科团队合作:功能恢复计划中临床医生的经验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9247-3.
2
Implementation of a Transdisciplinary Team for the Transition Support of Medically and Socially Complex Youth.为医疗和社会情况复杂的青少年提供过渡支持的跨学科团队的实施
J Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):661-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Multiprofessional teamwork in work-related medical rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者工作相关医学康复中的多专业团队合作。
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Jan;47(1):58-65. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1893.
4
The impact of organisational and individual factors on team communication in surgery: a qualitative study.组织因素和个体因素对手术团队沟通的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):732-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
5
: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder perspectives on adding a chiropractor to the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team.利益相关者对在多学科康复团队中增加一名脊椎指压治疗师的观点的定性分析。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Jun 22;26:29. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0200-4. eCollection 2018.
6
Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematic review.跨专业团队合作与慢性病护理中的团队干预:一项系统综述。
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):15-28. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1051616. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
7
What makes team communication effective: a qualitative analysis of interprofessional primary care team members' perspectives.是什么让团队沟通变得有效:对跨专业基层医疗团队成员观点的定性分析。
J Interprof Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):836-838. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1577809. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
8
The role of relational routines in hindering transdisciplinary collaboration: the case of the setting up of a team in an Italian Breast Unit.关系惯例在阻碍跨学科合作中的作用:以意大利乳腺科设立团队为例。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):251-258. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1649643. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
Transdisciplinary care in the emergency department: A qualitative analysis.急诊科的跨学科护理:一项定性分析。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Mar;25:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
10
"Coming together, keeping together, working together": interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary research and nursing.“汇聚、凝聚、协作”:从跨学科到跨领域研究与护理
Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.02.007.

引用本文的文献

1
"You do need each member of the team to bring that next piece of the puzzle": Allied health professionals' experience of interprofessional complex care in hospital settings.“团队中的每个成员都确实需要带来拼图的下一块”:专职医疗人员在医院环境中提供跨专业复杂护理的经验。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 14;20(3):e0317799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317799. eCollection 2025.
2
Community service rehabilitation therapists' perspectives of cross-disciplinary supervision.社区服务康复治疗师对跨学科监督的看法。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2025 Feb 21;67(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/safp.v67i1.6077.
3
KSNR Clinical Consensus Statements: Rehabilitation of Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
What's so great about rehabilitation teams? An ethnographic study of interprofessional collaboration in a rehabilitation unit.康复团队究竟有何出色之处?一项关于康复科跨专业协作的人种志研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.021.
2
The You CAN campaign: teamwork training for patients and families in ambulatory oncology.“你能行”运动:门诊肿瘤学中针对患者及其家属的团队合作培训
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Feb;35(2):63-71. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35009-6.
3
Effective interprofessional teams: "contact is not enough" to build a team.
KSNR临床共识声明:帕金森病患者的康复治疗
Brain Neurorehabil. 2020 May 27;13(2):e17. doi: 10.12786/bn.2020.13.e17. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Meta-ethnography to understand healthcare professionals' experience of treating adults with chronic non-malignant pain.元分析理解医护人员治疗慢性非恶性疼痛成人的体验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e018411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018411.
5
Preliminary testing of the Swedish version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS-S).跨专业团队协作评估量表瑞典语版(AITCS-S)的初步测试。
J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):499-504. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1159184. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
Essential features influencing collaboration in team-based non-specific back pain rehabilitation: Findings from a mixed methods study.影响基于团队的非特异性背痛康复中协作的关键因素:一项混合方法研究的结果
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):309-15. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1143457.
7
Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?理论领域框架能否解释临床质量干预措施的实施?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 21;13:530. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-530.
有效的跨专业团队:仅靠“接触”不足以打造一个团队。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Fall;28(4):228-34. doi: 10.1002/chp.189.
4
Team effectiveness in academic primary health care teams.学术性基层医疗团队的团队效能
J Interprof Care. 2008 Dec;22(6):598-611. doi: 10.1080/13561820802201819.
5
Interprofessional and transdisciplinary teamwork in health care.医疗保健中的跨专业和跨学科团队合作。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun;24 Suppl 1:S106-9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.835.
6
Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication.评估外科医生、护士和麻醉师术前检查表及团队简报以减少沟通失误。
Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):12-7; discussion 18. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.21.
7
Palliative care teams: effective through moral reflection.姑息治疗团队:通过道德反思实现有效治疗。
J Interprof Care. 2005 Dec;19(6):561-8. doi: 10.1080/13561820500404871.
8
Improving nursing unit teamwork.改善护理单元团队协作。
J Nurs Adm. 2005 Dec;35(12):550-6. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200512000-00009.
9
Blurred roles and permeable boundaries: the experience of multidisciplinary working in community mental health.角色模糊与界限渗透:社区心理健康领域多学科协作的体验
Health Soc Care Community. 2000 Nov;8(6):425-435. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00268.x.
10
Impact of interdisciplinary education in underserved areas: health professions collaboration in Tennessee.跨学科教育在服务欠缺地区的影响:田纳西州的卫生专业合作
J Prof Nurs. 1998 May-Jun;14(3):144-9. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(98)80089-6.