• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理评估作为一种治疗干预的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention.

机构信息

Purdue University, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2098, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):203-12. doi: 10.1037/a0018679.

DOI:10.1037/a0018679
PMID:20528048
Abstract

This study entails the use of meta-analytic techniques to calculate and analyze 18 independent and 52 nonindependent effect sizes across 17 published studies of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention. In this sample of studies, which involves 1,496 participants, a significant overall Cohen's d effect size of 0.423 (95% CI [0.321, 0.525]) was found, whereby 66% of treatment group means fell above the control and comparison group means. When categorical variables were taken into account, significant treatment group effects were found for therapy process variables (d = 1.117, [0.679, 1.555]), therapy outcomes (d = 0.367, [0.256, 0.478]), and combined process/outcome variables (d = 0.547, [0.193, 0.901]). These findings appear to be robust on the basis of fail-safe N calculations. Taken together, they suggest that psychological assessment procedures-when combined with personalized, collaborative, and highly involving test feedback-have positive, clinically meaningful effects on treatment, especially regarding treatment processes. They also have important implications for assessment practice, training, and policy making, as well as future research, which are discussed in the conclusion of the article.

摘要

本研究采用元分析技术,对 17 项已发表的心理评估治疗干预研究中的 18 个独立和 52 个非独立效应量进行计算和分析。在这项涉及 1496 名参与者的研究样本中,发现了一个显著的整体 Cohen's d 效应量为 0.423(95%CI [0.321, 0.525]),其中 66%的治疗组平均值高于对照组和比较组平均值。当考虑分类变量时,发现治疗过程变量(d = 1.117,[0.679, 1.555])、治疗结果(d = 0.367,[0.256, 0.478])和综合过程/结果变量(d = 0.547,[0.193, 0.901])具有显著的治疗组效应。根据失效安全 N 计算,这些发现似乎是稳健的。总的来说,它们表明心理评估程序——与个性化、协作和高度参与的测试反馈相结合——对治疗具有积极的、有临床意义的影响,特别是在治疗过程方面。它们对评估实践、培训和政策制定以及未来的研究也具有重要意义,这些都在文章的结论中进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention.心理评估作为一种治疗干预的荟萃分析。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):203-12. doi: 10.1037/a0018679.
2
Repairing alliance ruptures.修复联盟破裂。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Mar;48(1):80-7. doi: 10.1037/a0022140.
3
Racial/ethnic matching of clients and therapists in mental health services: a meta-analytic review of preferences, perceptions, and outcomes.心理健康服务中客户与治疗师的种族/民族匹配:偏好、认知和结果的元分析综述。
J Couns Psychol. 2011 Oct;58(4):537-54. doi: 10.1037/a0025266.
4
Positive regard.积极关注。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011 Mar;48(1):58-64. doi: 10.1037/a0022141.
5
Relation of the alliance with outcomes in youth psychotherapy: a meta-analysis.青少年心理治疗中联盟与疗效的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Jun;31(4):603-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
6
Training implications of harmful effects of psychological treatments.心理治疗有害效应的培训意义。
Am Psychol. 2010 Jan;65(1):34-49. doi: 10.1037/a0017330.
7
The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis.短期心理动力心理治疗在特定精神障碍中的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1208-16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1208.
8
Test of a brief theory of planned behaviour-based intervention to promote adolescent safe sex intentions.促进青少年安全性行为意图的基于计划行为理论的简短干预测试。
Br J Psychol. 2010 Feb;101(Pt 1):155-72. doi: 10.1348/000712609X431728. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
9
Unresolved questions concerning the effectiveness of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention: comment on Poston and Hanson (2010).关于心理评估作为一种治疗干预的有效性的未解决问题:评论波斯顿和汉森(2010)。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):1047-55; discussion 1056-62. doi: 10.1037/a0025177.
10
Direct comparisons of treatment modalities for youth disorders: a meta-analysis.青少年疾病治疗方式的直接比较:一项荟萃分析。
Psychother Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):5-14. doi: 10.1080/10503300701472131.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid-Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences.共同设计数字简短干预措施以降低慢性非癌性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物相关伤害风险:患者生活经历的定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 30;9:e57208. doi: 10.2196/57208.
2
Integrating personality functioning in brief psychotherapy for substance use disorders: a case study.将人格功能整合到物质使用障碍的简短心理治疗中:一项案例研究。
Discov Ment Health. 2024 Oct 29;4(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s44192-024-00107-z.
3
Results of a randomized controlled superiority trial of the effect of modified collaborative assessment vs. standard assessment on patients' readiness for psychotherapy (CO-ASSM-RCT).
一项关于改良协作评估与标准评估对心理治疗准备度影响的随机对照优势试验(CO-ASSM-RCT)的结果。
Trials. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08517-8.
4
Engagement challenges in digital mental health programs: hybrid approaches and user retention of an online self-knowledge journey in Brazil.数字心理健康项目中的参与挑战:巴西在线自我认知之旅的混合方法与用户留存
Front Digit Health. 2024 Sep 25;6:1383999. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1383999. eCollection 2024.
5
The use of CAMS and DBT to effectively treat patients who are suicidal.使用CAMS和DBT有效治疗有自杀倾向的患者。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 18;15:1354430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1354430. eCollection 2024.
6
Using Wearable Digital Devices to Screen Children for Mental Health Conditions: Ethical Promises and Challenges.使用可穿戴数字设备筛查儿童心理健康状况:伦理承诺与挑战。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 18;24(10):3214. doi: 10.3390/s24103214.
7
Assessing the patient's affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the .评估患者对其心理治疗师的情感认知:对……的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 24;15:1346760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346760. eCollection 2024.
8
Psychotherapists' Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Qualitative Meta-analysis.心理治疗师在治疗过程中使用常规结果监测的经验:一项定性元分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):106-122. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01348-4. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
Increasing character strength knowledge, interest, and skill: preliminary evidence for a collaborative and multimethod assessment procedure.增强性格优势知识、兴趣和技能:一种协作式多方法评估程序的初步证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1179052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179052. eCollection 2023.
10
Development and Initial Validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ) and the Rift In-Session Questionnaire (RISQ).会话期间患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)和会话期间裂痕问卷(RISQ)的开发与初步验证。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5156. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155156.