Critical Care Department, Hospital de Sabadell, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Sabadell, Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Sep;29(9):1173-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0971-6. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
In this study, we aimed to determine the utility of a multiple system intervention to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) in our intensive care unit (ICU). A prospective cohort study was undertaken in the medical and surgical ICU at a university hospital. We applied five measures: educational sessions about inserting and maintaining central venous catheters, skin cleaning with chlorhexidine, a checklist during catheter insertion, subclavian vein insertion and avoiding femoral insertion whenever possible, and removing unnecessary catheters. We determined the rate of CR-BSI per 1,000 catheter-days during the intervention (March to December 2007) and compared it with the rate during the same period in 2006 in which we applied only conventional preventive measures. CR-BSI was defined as the recovery of the same organism (same species, same antibiotic susceptibility profile) from catheter tip and blood cultures. We registered 4,289 patient-days and 3,572 catheter-days in the control period and 4,174 patient-days and 3,296 catheter-days in the intervention period. No significant differences in the number of patients with central venous catheters during the two periods were observed: catheters were used in 81.5% of patients during the control period and in 80.6% of patients during the intervention period. During the control period, 24 CR-BSI were diagnosed (6.7/1,000 catheter-days); during the intervention period, 8 CR-BSI were diagnosed (2.4/1,000 catheter-days) (relative risk 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.80; p = 0.015). Nurses interrupted the procedure to correct at least one aspect when completing the checklist in 17.7% of insertions. In conclusion, a multiple system intervention applying evidence-based measures reduced the incidence of CR-BSI in our ICU.
在这项研究中,我们旨在确定多项系统干预措施在我们的重症监护病房(ICU)中减少导管相关血流感染(CR-BSI)的效果。我们在一所大学医院的内科和外科 ICU 进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。我们应用了五项措施:关于插入和维护中心静脉导管的教育课程、使用氯己定进行皮肤清洁、导管插入时使用检查表、尽可能选择锁骨下静脉插入和避免股静脉插入,以及移除不必要的导管。我们确定了干预期间(2007 年 3 月至 12 月)每 1000 个导管日的 CR-BSI 发生率,并将其与 2006 年同期应用常规预防措施时的发生率进行了比较。CR-BSI 的定义是从导管尖端和血液培养物中回收相同的生物体(相同的物种,相同的抗生素敏感性谱)。我们在对照组记录了 4289 个患者日和 3572 个导管日,在干预组记录了 4174 个患者日和 3296 个导管日。两个时期使用中心静脉导管的患者数量没有显著差异:对照组中有 81.5%的患者使用了导管,干预组中有 80.6%的患者使用了导管。在对照组中,诊断出 24 例 CR-BSI(6.7/1000 导管日);在干预组中,诊断出 8 例 CR-BSI(2.4/1000 导管日)(相对风险 0.36;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.16 至 0.80;p = 0.015)。当护士在完成检查表时,至少有 17.7%的插入操作中断,以纠正至少一个方面。总之,应用基于证据的多项系统干预措施降低了我们 ICU 中 CR-BSI 的发生率。