• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让公民和患者参与健康研究。

Involving citizens and patients in health research.

作者信息

Venuta Rosa, Graham Ian D

机构信息

Partnerships and Citizen Engagement Branch, The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):215-22. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e62bd7.

DOI:10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e62bd7
PMID:20539148
Abstract

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research's (CIHR), Canada's premier health research funding agency, is moving forward in realizing a more systematic, ongoing integration of citizens' input in priority setting, governance and funding programs and tools. In 2008, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) developed a Framework for Citizen Engagement. This Framework establishes guidelines for implementing a more systematic approach to consulting and engaging citizens, such as in assessing the merit and relevance of research applications, developing strategic plans, setting research priorities and for strengthening their role on CIHR's governance committees. This paper describes the current context for public consultation in Canada's federal health care system, the new CIHR citizen engagement framework and discusses citizen engagement activities and efforts undertaken by CIHR institutes and branches. It reviews the methods used by CIHR to engage citizens in four key focus areas: 1. Representation on CIHR's Boards and Committees; 2. Corporate and Institute strategic plans, priorities, policies, and guidelines; 3. Research priority setting and integrated knowledge translation; 4. Knowledge dissemination and public outreach. In discussing CIHR's experiences, the paper identifies some of the challenges and benefits of engaging citizens in CIHR's research processes, including participating in decision making and informing strategic priorities.

摘要

加拿大首要的健康研究资助机构——加拿大卫生研究院(CIHR),正在推进实现公民意见在优先事项设定、治理以及资助项目和工具方面更系统、持续的整合。2008年,加拿大卫生研究院(CIHR)制定了公民参与框架。该框架为实施更系统的咨询和让公民参与的方法确立了指导方针,比如在评估研究申请的价值和相关性、制定战略计划、设定研究优先事项以及加强他们在CIHR治理委员会中的作用等方面。本文描述了加拿大联邦医疗保健系统中公众咨询的当前背景、CIHR新的公民参与框架,并讨论了CIHR各研究所和部门开展的公民参与活动及努力。它回顾了CIHR在四个关键重点领域让公民参与所使用的方法:1. 在CIHR董事会和委员会中的代表性;2. 机构和研究所的战略计划、优先事项、政策及指导方针;3. 研究优先事项设定和综合知识转化;4. 知识传播和公众宣传。在讨论CIHR的经验时,本文指出了让公民参与CIHR研究过程的一些挑战和益处,包括参与决策和为战略优先事项提供信息。

相似文献

1
Involving citizens and patients in health research.让公民和患者参与健康研究。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):215-22. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e62bd7.
2
Confined to a tokenistic status: Social scientists in leadership roles in a national health research funding agency.囿于象征性地位:国家卫生研究资助机构中担任领导职务的社会科学家。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jul;185:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Systematic analysis of global health research funding in Canada, 2000-2016.2000-2016 年加拿大全球健康研究资金的系统分析。
Can J Public Health. 2020 Feb;111(1):80-95. doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00247-8. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Request for planning ideas. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, HHS. Notice.医疗保健政策与研究机构(美国卫生与公众服务部)规划思路征集通知
Fed Regist. 1999 Apr 15;64(72):18619-22.
7
Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 2. Backgrounds, resources and activities of board members.加拿大各省医疗保健权力下放:2. 董事会成员的背景、资源与活动
CMAJ. 1997 Feb 15;156(4):513-20.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Program Report: KidneyPRO, a Web-based Training Module for Patient Engagement in Kidney Research.项目报告:KidneyPRO,一个用于患者参与肾脏研究的基于网络的培训模块。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Dec 21;7:2054358120979255. doi: 10.1177/2054358120979255. eCollection 2020.
10
Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 1. An introduction to the issues.加拿大各省医疗保健权力下放:1. 问题介绍
CMAJ. 1997 Feb 1;156(3):371-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Involvement in a Systematic Review Project: Reporting Our Approach Using the ACTIVE Framework.公众参与系统评价项目:使用ACTIVE框架报告我们的方法。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(4):e70323. doi: 10.1111/hex.70323.
2
Community involvement and engagement in designing a social-media based educational intervention for oral and sexual health promotion in transgender women in Malaysia: a narrative summary.马来西亚跨性别女性参与设计基于社交媒体的口腔和性健康促进教育干预措施的社区参与情况:叙述性总结
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 27;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00683-6.
3
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process.
研究指南与清单中协同设计首选组件的开发:一项范围综述及改良德尔菲法流程的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 30;12:e50463. doi: 10.2196/50463.
4
Creating space for theory when codesigning healthcare interventions.在共同设计医疗保健干预措施时为理论创造空间。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Jun;29(4):572-575. doi: 10.1111/jep.13720. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Patient and Public Involvement for Dementia Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Developing Capacity and Capability in South Asia.低收入和中等收入国家痴呆症研究中的患者及公众参与:南亚地区能力建设
Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 23;12:637000. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.637000. eCollection 2021.
6
Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?患者及公众参与整合知识转化研究:我们做到了吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 12;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
7
Public involvement in health research systems: a governance framework.公众参与健康研究系统:治理框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Aug 6;16(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0352-7.
8
Framework for Advancing the Reporting of Patient Engagement in Rheumatology Research Projects.推进类风湿病学研究项目中患者参与情况报告的框架
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 Jul;19(7):38. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0666-4.
9
'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review.支持患者及家属参与医疗决策的“实用”资源:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 15;14:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-175.
10
Endovascular treatment for multiple sclerosis: The intersection of science, policy and the public.多发性硬化症的血管内治疗:科学、政策与公众的交汇点。
Open Med. 2010;4(4):e197-9. Epub 2010 Dec 7.