Suppr超能文献

认知行为疗法是否比其他疗法更有效?一项荟萃分析。

Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review.

机构信息

The Institute of Living, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):710-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 25.

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective for a range of psychiatric disorders. However, it remains unclear whether CBT is superior to other forms of psychotherapy, and previous quantitative reviews on this topic are difficult to interpret. The aim of the present quantitative review was to determine whether CBT yields superior outcomes to alternative forms of psychotherapy, and to examine the relationship between differential outcome and study-specific variables. From a computerized literature search through September 2007 and references from previous reviews, English-language articles were selected that described randomized controlled trials of CBT vs. another form of psychotherapy. Of these, only those in which the CBT and alternative therapy condition were judged to be bona fide treatments, rather than "intent-to-fail" conditions, were retained for analysis (28 articles representing 26 studies, N=1981). Four raters identified post-treatment and follow-up effect size estimates, as well as study-specific variables including (but not limited to) type of CBT and other psychotherapy, sample diagnosis, type of outcome measure used, and age group. Studies were rated for methodological adequacy including (but not limited to) the use of reliable and valid measures and independent evaluators. Researcher allegiance was determined by contacting the principal investigators of the source articles. CBT was superior to psychodynamic therapy, although not interpersonal or supportive therapies, at post-treatment and at follow-up. Methodological strength of studies was not associated with larger or smaller differences between CBT and other therapies. Researchers' self-reported allegiance was positively correlated with the strength of CBT's superiority; however, when controlling for allegiance ratings, CBT was still associated with a significant advantage. The superiority of CBT over alternative therapies was evident only among patients with anxiety or depressive disorders. These results argue against previous claims of treatment equivalence and suggest that CBT should be considered a first-line psychosocial treatment of choice, at least for patients with anxiety and depressive disorders.

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)对一系列精神疾病有效。然而,CBT 是否优于其他形式的心理治疗方法尚不清楚,且先前关于此主题的定量综述难以解释。本定量综述的目的是确定 CBT 是否比其他形式的心理治疗方法产生更好的结果,并研究差异结果与研究特定变量之间的关系。通过计算机检索截至 2007 年 9 月的文献和先前综述的参考文献,选择了描述 CBT 与另一种心理治疗方法的随机对照试验的英文文章。在这些文章中,只有那些被认为是真正的治疗方法而不是“意图失败”条件的 CBT 和替代治疗条件的文章才被保留用于分析(28 篇文章代表 26 项研究,N=1981)。四位评估者确定了治疗后和随访时的效应大小估计值,以及研究特定变量,包括(但不限于)CBT 和其他心理治疗类型、样本诊断、使用的结果测量类型以及年龄组。研究的方法学充分性进行了评估,包括(但不限于)使用可靠和有效的测量和独立评估者。研究人员的忠诚通过联系来源文章的主要研究者来确定。CBT 在治疗后和随访时优于精神动力治疗,但不如人际或支持性治疗。研究的方法学强度与 CBT 与其他疗法之间的差异大小无关。研究人员自我报告的忠诚与 CBT 优越性的强度呈正相关;然而,当控制忠诚度评分时,CBT 仍然与显著优势相关。CBT 优于替代疗法的优势仅在焦虑或抑郁障碍患者中明显。这些结果反对先前关于治疗等效性的说法,并表明 CBT 应该被视为首选的一线心理社会治疗方法,至少对于焦虑和抑郁障碍患者而言。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验