Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 South 1530 East (Room 502), Behavioral Sciences Building, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
J Pers. 2010 Jun;78(3):1011-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00641.x.
Personality risk factors for physical illness are typically studied individually and apart from risk factors reflecting the social environment, potentially fostering a piecemeal understanding of psychosocial influences on health. Because it can be used to describe both personality and social relationship processes, the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) provides an integrative approach to psychosocial risk. In 301 married couples we examined IPC correlates of 3 risk factor domains: anger, hostility, and aggressiveness; neuroticism; and marital adjustment. Risk factors displayed IPC locations ranging from hostile dominance (e.g., verbal aggressiveness, marital conflict) to hostility (e.g., anger) to hostile submissiveness (e.g., anxiety, depression); protective factors (marital satisfaction and support) reflected warmth or friendliness in the IPC. Similar descriptions were found using self-reports and spouse ratings of IPC dimensions, indicating that interpersonal styles associated with risk factors do not simply reflect common method variance. Findings identify interpersonal processes reflecting low affiliation or high hostility as a common component of risk and indicate distinctions among risk factors along the dominance dimension.
人格风险因素与身体疾病通常是单独研究的,与反映社会环境的风险因素分开,这可能导致对心理社会因素对健康影响的零碎理解。由于它可以用来描述人格和社会关系过程,因此人际双相(IPC)提供了一种综合的心理社会风险方法。在 301 对已婚夫妇中,我们研究了 3 个风险因素领域的 IPC 相关性:愤怒、敌意和攻击性;神经质;和婚姻调整。风险因素显示出 IPC 位置从敌对支配(例如,言语攻击性,婚姻冲突)到敌意(例如,愤怒)到敌对顺从(例如,焦虑,抑郁);保护因素(婚姻满意度和支持)反映了 IPC 中的温暖或友好。使用自我报告和配偶对 IPC 维度的评分也发现了类似的描述,这表明与风险因素相关的人际风格并不简单地反映常见的方法偏差。研究结果确定了反映低亲和力或高敌意的人际过程是风险的一个共同组成部分,并表明沿支配维度区分风险因素。