• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《Connor-Davidson 韧性量表韩文版的信度和效度》

Reliability and validity of the korean version of the connor-davidson resilience scale.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Jun;7(2):109-15. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109. Epub 2010 Apr 6.

DOI:10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109
PMID:20577619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890864/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) measures various aspects of psychological resilience in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other psychiatric ailments. This study sought to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (K-CD-RISC).

METHODS

In total, 576 participants were enrolled (497 females and 79 males), including hospital nurses, university students, and firefighters. Subjects were evaluated using the K-CD-RISC, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were examined as a measure of reliability, and convergent validity and factor analysis were also performed to evaluate validity.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability were 0.93 and 0.93, respectively. The total score on the K-CD-RISC was positively correlated with the RSES (r=0.56, p<0.01). Conversely, BDI (r=-0.46, p<0.01), PSS (r=-0.32, p<0.01), and IES-R scores (r=-0.26, p<0.01) were negatively correlated with the K-CD-RISC. The K-CD-RISC showed a five-factor structure that explained 57.2% of the variance.

CONCLUSION

The K-CD-RISC showed good reliability and validity for measurement of resilience among Korean subjects.

摘要

目的

Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC)衡量创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和其他精神疾病患者的各种心理韧性方面。本研究旨在评估 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(K-CD-RISC)的韩国版本的信度和效度。

方法

共有 576 名参与者(497 名女性和 79 名男性),包括医院护士、大学生和消防员,使用 K-CD-RISC、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)、罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)和感知压力量表(PSS)对他们进行评估。作为衡量可靠性的标准,对测试-重测信度和内部一致性进行了检验,同时还进行了收敛有效性和因子分析。

结果

克朗巴赫的 alpha 系数和测试-重测信度分别为 0.93 和 0.93。K-CD-RISC 的总分与 RSES 呈正相关(r=0.56,p<0.01)。相反,BDI(r=-0.46,p<0.01)、PSS(r=-0.32,p<0.01)和 IES-R 评分(r=-0.26,p<0.01)与 K-CD-RISC 呈负相关。K-CD-RISC 显示出五因素结构,可解释 57.2%的方差。

结论

K-CD-RISC 对韩国受试者的韧性测量具有良好的信度和效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7630/2890864/0605e157d98e/pi-7-109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7630/2890864/0605e157d98e/pi-7-109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7630/2890864/0605e157d98e/pi-7-109-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the korean version of the connor-davidson resilience scale.《Connor-Davidson 韧性量表韩文版的信度和效度》
Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Jun;7(2):109-15. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
2
Psychometric properties of the 10-item Conner-Davidson resilience scale on toxic chemical-exposed workers in South Korea.韩国有毒化学物质暴露工人的10项康纳-戴维森心理韧性量表的心理测量特性。
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2018 Aug 13;30:52. doi: 10.1186/s40557-018-0265-5. eCollection 2018.
3
Greek Version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: Psychometric Properties in a Sample of 546 Subjects.康纳-戴维森韧性量表的希腊语版本:546名受试者样本的心理测量特性
In Vivo. 2018 Nov-Dec;32(6):1629-1634. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11424.
4
Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese military personnel.中文版10项Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表在中国军人中的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 4;14:1163382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1163382. eCollection 2023.
5
Validation of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 in firefighters and rescue workers.消防员和救援人员中韩文版Connor-Davidson韧性量表-2的验证
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 May;59:123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Psychometric properties of two abbreviated Connor-Davidson Resilience scales in Chinese infertile couples.中文版康纳-戴维森韧性量表在不孕夫妇中应用的心理测量学特性。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2405-2414. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02820-6. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
7
Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item CD-RISC) in young adults.10 项 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(10 项 CD-RISC)西班牙语版在年轻成年人中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Aug 5;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-63.
8
[Validation of the 10-item resilience scale with Mexican college students].[墨西哥大学生10项心理韧性量表的效度验证]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2020 May 18;58(3):292-297. doi: 10.24875/RMIMSS.M21000033.
9
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the 10-item Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) among adolescent mothers in Peru.秘鲁青少年母亲中10项Connor Davidson韧性量表(CD-RISC)西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Dec 20;14(1):29-40. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00295-9. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Measuring resilience with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): which version to choose?使用 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC)衡量韧性:应该选择哪个版本?
Spinal Cord. 2019 May;57(5):360-366. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0240-1. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Spiritual Well-Being and Care Burden among Families of Patients with Terminal Cancer: Is Emotional Distress a Crucial Thing?晚期癌症患者家庭的精神健康与照护负担:情绪困扰是关键因素吗?
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Sep 1;28(3):115-119. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2025.28.3.115.
2
The Effects of Operating Room Nurses' Experiences of Verbal Violence, Resilience, and Social Support on Post-Traumatic Stress.手术室护士遭受言语暴力的经历、心理韧性及社会支持对创伤后应激的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 17;13(16):2027. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162027.
3
Latent Profile Analysis of Resilience and Its Association With Psychological Factors in Patients Diagnosed With Depression and Anxiety Disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of the Resilience Scale.复原力量表综述。
J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(2):105-13. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.2.105.
2
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.《事件影响量表修订版》韩文版的信效度
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Aug;50(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
3
Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience.康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)的心理测量分析与修订:一项10项韧性测量指标的验证
抑郁症和焦虑症患者复原力的潜在剖面分析及其与心理因素的关联
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Aug;22(8):949-959. doi: 10.30773/pi.2025.0018. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
4
Family relationships and caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with terminal cancer.晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者的家庭关系与照顾负担
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 22;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01855-7.
5
Relationship between emotion regulation skills, resilience, depression and anxiety symptom severity in patients with mood disorders and non-clinical participants: a mediation model.情绪障碍患者与非临床参与者的情绪调节技能、心理韧性、抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度之间的关系:一种中介模型
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02050-8.
6
Exploring the Role of Practical and Emotional Death Preparation in Reducing Emotional Distress Among Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.探索实际死亡准备和情感死亡准备在减轻晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者情绪困扰中的作用:一项多中心横断面研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 21;17(8):1380. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081380.
7
Examining Work Engagement in Integrated Nursing-Care Service Wards: Insights from Structural Equation Modeling.综合护理服务病房工作投入状况调查:基于结构方程模型的见解
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Aug 16;2024:5670381. doi: 10.1155/2024/5670381. eCollection 2024.
8
Facilitators and Barriers Associated With Mental Health Service Utilization Among Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorder in Korea.韩国酒精使用障碍患者心理健康服务利用的促进因素和障碍
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Jan;22(1):1-9. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0148. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
9
Low Psychological Resilience Predict the Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder in General Population: National Mental Health Survey of Korea 2021.心理韧性低预示普通人群酒精使用障碍风险:2021年韩国全国心理健康调查
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2025 Feb 28;23(1):53-64. doi: 10.9758/cpn.24.1171. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
10
Therapeutic Potential of Social Chatbots in Alleviating Loneliness and Social Anxiety: Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study.社交聊天机器人在缓解孤独感和社交焦虑方面的治疗潜力:准实验性混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 14;27:e65589. doi: 10.2196/65589.
J Trauma Stress. 2007 Dec;20(6):1019-28. doi: 10.1002/jts.20271.
4
Maximizing resilience through diverse levels of inquiry: Prevailing paradigms, possibilities, and priorities for the future.通过不同层次的探究实现复原力最大化:当前范式、可能性及未来优先事项。
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Summer;19(3):931-55. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407000454.
5
An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials.Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表(CD-RISC)的简化版,即CD-RISC2:心理测量特性及其在精神药理学试验中的应用。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Aug 30;152(2-3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
6
A review of instruments measuring resilience.测量心理韧性的工具综述。
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2006 Apr-Jun;29(2):103-25. doi: 10.1080/01460860600677643.
7
Assessment of resilience in the aftermath of trauma.创伤后恢复力的评估。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67 Suppl 2:46-9.
8
Trauma, resilience and saliostasis: effects of treatment in post-traumatic stress disorder.创伤、复原力与稳态:创伤后应激障碍的治疗效果
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Jan;20(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200501000-00009.
9
Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health.心理韧性与积极情绪粒度:探讨积极情绪对应对和健康的益处。
J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1161-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x.
10
Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences.有复原力的个体利用积极情绪从负面情绪经历中恢复过来。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):320-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.