Suppr超能文献

严重 COPD 患者的物理训练辅助手段:吸氧还是无创通气?

Adjuncts to physical training of patients with severe COPD: oxygen or noninvasive ventilation?

机构信息

Cardiopulmonary Physiotherapy Laboratory, Physiotherapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Washington Luis, Km 235 São Carlos, São Paulo 13565-905, Brazil.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2010 Jul;55(7):885-94.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown positive effects from noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or supplemental oxygen on exercise capacity in patients with COPD. However, the best adjunct for promoting physiologic adaptations to physical training in patients with severe COPD remains to be investigated.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients (mean +/- SD age 68 +/- 7 y) with stable COPD (FEV(1) 34 +/- 9% of predicted) undergoing an exercise training program were randomized to either NIV (n = 14) or supplemental oxygen (n = 14) during group training to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (S(pO2)) >/= 90%. Physical training consisted of treadmill walking (at 70% of maximal speed) 3 times a week, for 6 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks. Assessments included physiological adaptations during incremental exercise testing (ratio of lactate concentration to walk speed, oxygen uptake [V (O2)], and dyspnea), exercise tolerance during 6-min walk test, leg fatigue, maximum inspiratory pressure, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Two patients in each group dropped out due to COPD exacerbations and lack of exercise program adherence, and 24 completed the training program. Both groups improved 6-min walk distance, symptoms, and health-related quality of life. However, there were significant differences between the NIV and supplemental-oxygen groups in lactate/speed ratio (33% vs -4%), maximum inspiratory pressure (80% vs 23%), 6-min walk distance (122 m vs 47 m), and leg fatigue (25% vs 11%). In addition, changes in S(pO2)/speed, V (O2), and dyspnea were greater with NIV than with supplemental-oxygen.

CONCLUSIONS

NIV alone is better than supplemental oxygen alone in promoting beneficial physiologic adaptations to physical exercise in patients with severe COPD.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,无创通气(NIV)或补充氧气对 COPD 患者的运动能力有积极影响。然而,促进严重 COPD 患者对体育锻炼产生生理性适应的最佳辅助手段仍有待研究。

方法

28 例稳定期 COPD 患者(平均年龄 68 +/- 7 岁),FEV(1)为预计值的 34 +/- 9%,接受运动训练计划,随机分为 NIV(n = 14)或补充氧气(n = 14)组,在团体训练中维持外周血氧饱和度(S(pO2))> = 90%。物理训练包括每周 3 次,每次在跑步机上行走(最大速度的 70%),持续 6 周。患者在基线和 6 周后进行评估。评估包括递增运动测试期间的生理适应(乳酸浓度与步行速度的比值、摄氧量(V(O2))和呼吸困难)、6 分钟步行测试的运动耐量、腿部疲劳、最大吸气压力和健康相关生活质量。

结果

每组各有 2 名患者因 COPD 加重和缺乏运动计划依从性而退出,24 名患者完成了训练计划。两组患者的 6 分钟步行距离、症状和健康相关生活质量均有所改善。然而,NIV 和补充氧气组之间在乳酸/速度比(33%比-4%)、最大吸气压力(80%比 23%)、6 分钟步行距离(122 米比 47 米)和腿部疲劳(25%比 11%)方面存在显著差异。此外,NIV 比补充氧气组更能促进 S(pO2)/速度、V(O2)和呼吸困难的变化。

结论

NIV 单独应用比补充氧气单独应用更能促进严重 COPD 患者对体育锻炼产生有益的生理性适应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验