Deniz Sami, Tuncel Şenay, Gürgün Alev, Elmas Funda
Department of Chest Diseases, Health Sciences University, Dr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Research and Educational Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Department of Chest Diseases, Ekol Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Sep;24(5):262-269. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23040.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the world. Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training and supplemental oxygen during exercise training during pulmonary rehabilitation practice in comparison with only exercise training on lung functions, blood gases, lactate levels, respiratory muscle pressures, dyspnea, walking distances, quality of life, and depression in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The main outcome measure is exercise capacity (6-minute walk test), and the secondary end-point included quality of life.
Thirty-five patients (mean ± SD age, 65.4 ± 6.5 years) with a mean bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration of 39.4 ± 7%, undergoing an 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation, were randomized to either non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training, supplemental oxygen during exercise training, or exercise training groups. The improvements in respiratory muscle strength were higher in non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training patients than the moderate improvements in the exercise training group. Both non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training and supplemental oxygen during exercise training groups showed significant increases in the 6-minute walk test and incremental shuttle walk test. However, the increase in walking distance was better in non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training group (69.8 ± 53.2 m in 6-minute walk test and 66.6 ± 65.2 m in incremental shuttle walk test, P = .001 and P = .005, respectively) compared to supplemental oxygen during exercise training group (42.5+55.5 m in 6-minute walk test and 53.5+70.2 m in incremental shuttle walk test, P = .01 each, respectively). The total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score was similar in all study groups after the intervention. Symptoms of depression significantly improved only in non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training group (-2.8+2.8, P = .006).
Non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) added to supplemental oxygen during exercise training was associated with better physiological adaptations than other modalities.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病是目前全球第四大死因。推荐对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行肺康复治疗。
本研究旨在评估在肺康复治疗中,与单纯运动训练相比,无创通气、补充氧气以及运动训练期间补充氧气对重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能、血气、乳酸水平、呼吸肌压力、呼吸困难、步行距离、生活质量和抑郁的影响。主要结局指标是运动能力(6分钟步行试验),次要终点包括生活质量。
35例患者(平均年龄±标准差,65.4±6.5岁),支气管扩张剂使用后第1秒用力呼气量平均为39.4±7%,接受为期8周的门诊肺康复治疗,被随机分为无创通气、补充氧气及运动训练组、运动训练期间补充氧气组或运动训练组。无创通气、补充氧气及运动训练组患者呼吸肌力量的改善程度高于运动训练组的中度改善。无创通气、补充氧气及运动训练组和运动训练期间补充氧气组在6分钟步行试验和递增往返步行试验中均有显著增加。然而,与运动训练期间补充氧气组相比,无创通气、补充氧气及运动训练组的步行距离增加更明显(6分钟步行试验中为69.8±53.2米,递增往返步行试验中为66.6±65.2米,P分别为0.001和0.005),运动训练期间补充氧气组在6分钟步行试验中为42.5 + 55.5米,递增往返步行试验中为53.5 + 70.2米,P均为0.01)。干预后所有研究组的圣乔治呼吸问卷总分相似。仅无创通气、补充氧气及运动训练组的抑郁症状有显著改善(-2.8 + 2.8,P = 0.006)。
运动训练期间补充氧气并联合无创正压通气(NIPPV)比其他方式具有更好的生理适应性。