Stolzenberg Ross M, Lindgren James
Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Demography. 2010 May;47(2):269-98. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0100.
We construct demographic models of retirement and death in office of U.S. Supreme Court justices, a group that has gained demographic notice, evaded demographic analysis, and is said to diverge from expected retirement patterns. Models build on prior multistate labor force status studies, and data permit an unusually clear distinction between voluntary and "induced" retirement. Using data on every justice from 1789 through 2006, with robust, cluster-corrected, discrete-time, censored, event-history methods, we (1) estimate retirement effects of pension eligibility, age, health, and tenure on the timing of justices' retirements and deaths in office, (2) resolve decades of debate over the politicized departure hypothesis that justices tend to alter the timing of their retirements for the political benefit or detriment of the incumbent president, (3) reconsider the nature of rationality in retirement decisions, and (4) consider the relevance of organizational conditions as well as personal circumstances to retirement decisions. Methodological issues are addressed.
我们构建了美国最高法院大法官退休和在职死亡的人口统计模型。最高法院大法官群体已受到人口统计学关注,但却避开了人口统计学分析,且据说其退休模式与预期不同。这些模型基于先前的多状态劳动力状况研究构建,并且数据使得我们能够异常清晰地区分自愿退休和“诱导性”退休。利用1789年至2006年每位大法官的数据,采用稳健的、经聚类校正的、离散时间、删失的事件史方法,我们(1)估计养老金资格、年龄、健康状况和任期对大法官退休时间和在职死亡时间的影响,(2)解决了几十年来关于政治化离职假说的争论,该假说认为大法官倾向于为现任总统的政治利益或损害而改变其退休时间,(3)重新审视退休决策中的理性本质,以及(4)考虑组织条件和个人情况与退休决策的相关性。文中还讨论了方法学问题。