Johnson N J, Sorlie P D, Backlund E
Demographic Statistical Methods Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC 20233, USA.
Demography. 1999 Aug;36(3):355-67.
We compare mortality differences for specific and general categories of occupations using a national cohort of approximately 380,000 persons aged 25-64 from the U.S. National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Based on comparisons of relative risk obtained from Cox proportional-hazards model analyses, higher risk is observed in moving across the occupational spectrum from the technical, highly skilled occupations to less-skilled and generally more labor-intensive occupations. Mortality differences obtained for social status groups of specific occupations are almost completely accounted for by adjustments for income and education. Important differences are shown to exist for selected specific occupations beyond those accounted for by social status, income, and education. High-risk specific occupations include taxi drivers, cooks, longshoremen, and transportation operatives. Low-risk specific occupations include lawyers, natural scientists, teachers, farmers, and a variety of engineers.
我们使用来自美国国家纵向死亡率研究的约38万名年龄在25至64岁之间的全国队列,比较特定职业类别和一般职业类别的死亡率差异。基于Cox比例风险模型分析得出的相对风险比较,从技术含量高的高技能职业转向技能较低且通常劳动强度更大的职业时,观察到风险更高。特定职业社会地位群体的死亡率差异几乎完全可以通过收入和教育调整来解释。除了社会地位、收入和教育所解释的差异之外,选定的特定职业还存在重要差异。高风险的特定职业包括出租车司机、厨师、码头工人和运输工人。低风险的特定职业包括律师、自然科学家、教师、农民和各类工程师。