使用基于持续时间的测量方法对模糊刺激偏好进行检查。
Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
作者信息
DeLeon I G, Iwata B A, Conners J, Wallace M D
机构信息
University of Florida, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.
Abstract
Items that produced ambiguous results in an approach-based preference assessment were reassessed using a duration-based assessment. The reinforcing effects of three items on free-operant responding were subsequently tested. The results suggested that the duration-based assessment produced slightly more differentiated results and that predictions about reinforcer value, based on this assessment, were accurate.
摘要
在基于方法的偏好评估中产生模糊结果的项目，使用基于时长的评估进行重新评估。随后测试了三个项目对自由操作反应的强化效果。结果表明，基于时长的评估产生的区分结果略多一些，并且基于该评估对强化物价值的预测是准确的。
相似文献
1
Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.
2
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
3
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
4
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
5
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
6
Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-463.
7
Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.
Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15-25.
8
Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):219-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219.
9
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
10
Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):347-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-347.
引用本文的文献
1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):206-221. doi: 10.1002/jaba.359. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
3
Functional analysis and treatment of arranging and ordering by individuals with an autism spectrum disorder.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Spring;45(1):1-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-1.
4
Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):835-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-835.
5
An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):145-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145.
6
The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):767-72. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.767-772.
7
The effects of blocking mouthing of leisure items on their effectiveness as reinforcers.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):761-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.761-765.
8
The effects of reinforcement magnitude on functional analysis outcomes.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):147-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.111-04.
9
Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):1-19. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-1.
10
Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):287-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-287.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
2
A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):137-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-137.
3
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
4
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件