• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.使用基于持续时间的测量方法对模糊刺激偏好进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.
2
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
3
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
4
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
5
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
6
Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.对通过预处理和每日简短偏好评估确定的刺激的相对强化效果进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-463.
7
Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.整合照顾者报告与系统的选择评估以加强强化物识别。
Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15-25.
8
Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.发育障碍和视力障碍儿童的强化物评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):219-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219.
9
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
10
Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.在单操作和并发程序中测量的强化物选择的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):347-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-347.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.对智力和发育障碍者过度合理化效应的定量综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):206-221. doi: 10.1002/jaba.359. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
3
Functional analysis and treatment of arranging and ordering by individuals with an autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍个体的排列和排序的功能分析与治疗。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Spring;45(1):1-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-1.
4
Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.评估不同强化物在偏好评估中维持问题行为的比率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):835-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-835.
5
An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training.功能性沟通训练治疗期间的复发评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):145-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145.
6
The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.短暂和延长刺激可获得性对偏好的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):767-72. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.767-772.
7
The effects of blocking mouthing of leisure items on their effectiveness as reinforcers.阻止对休闲物品的啃咬对其作为强化物的有效性的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):761-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.761-765.
8
The effects of reinforcement magnitude on functional analysis outcomes.强化幅度对功能分析结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):147-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.111-04.
9
Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.在短期和长期应用期间非条件强化的治疗效果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):1-19. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-1.
10
Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks.基于时长的职业任务偏好测量方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):287-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-287.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.评估用于评估强化物偏好的多重刺激呈现形式。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
2
A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.一种预测基于强化程序的正负效应的初步程序。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):137-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-137.
3
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
4
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.

使用基于持续时间的测量方法对模糊刺激偏好进行检查。

Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.

作者信息

DeLeon I G, Iwata B A, Conners J, Wallace M D

机构信息

University of Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):111-4. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111
PMID:10201108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284545/
Abstract

Items that produced ambiguous results in an approach-based preference assessment were reassessed using a duration-based assessment. The reinforcing effects of three items on free-operant responding were subsequently tested. The results suggested that the duration-based assessment produced slightly more differentiated results and that predictions about reinforcer value, based on this assessment, were accurate.

摘要

在基于方法的偏好评估中产生模糊结果的项目,使用基于时长的评估进行重新评估。随后测试了三个项目对自由操作反应的强化效果。结果表明,基于时长的评估产生的区分结果略多一些,并且基于该评估对强化物价值的预测是准确的。