Suppr超能文献

国际双相障碍学会神经认知评估工具(ISBD-BANC)。

The International Society for Bipolar Disorders-Battery for Assessment of Neurocognition (ISBD-BANC).

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2010 Jun;12(4):351-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00830.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although cognitive impairment is recognized as an important clinical feature of bipolar disorder, there is no standard cognitive battery that has been developed for use in bipolar disorder research. The aims of this paper were to identify the cognitive measures from the literature that show the greatest magnitude of impairment in bipolar disorder, to use this information to determine whether the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), developed for use in schizophrenia, might be suitable for bipolar disorder research, and to propose a preliminary battery of cognitive tests for use in bipolar disorder research.

METHODS

The project was conducted under the auspices of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders and involved a committee that comprised researchers with international expertise in the cognitive aspects of bipolar disorder. In order to identify cognitive tasks that show the largest magnitude of impairment in bipolar disorder, we reviewed the literature on studies assessing cognitive functioning (including social cognition) in bipolar disorder. We further provided a brief review of the cognitive overlap between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and evaluated the degree to which tasks included in the MCCB (or other identified tasks) might be suitable for use in bipolar disorder.

RESULTS

Based on evidence that cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder are similar in pattern but less severe than in schizophrenia, it was judged that most subtests comprising the MCCB appear appropriate for use in bipolar disorder. In addition to MCCB tests, other specific measures of more complex verbal learning (e.g., the California Verbal Learning Test) or executive function (Stroop Test, Trail Making Test-part B, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) also show substantial impairment in bipolar disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis reveals that the MCCB represents a good starting point for assessing cognitive deficits in research studies of bipolar disorder, but that other tasks including more complex verbal learning measures and tests of executive function should also be considered in assessing cognitive compromise in bipolar disorder. Several promising cognitive tasks that require further study in bipolar disorder are also presented.

摘要

目的

尽管认知障碍已被确认为双相情感障碍的重要临床特征,但目前尚无专门针对双相情感障碍研究的标准认知测试。本文旨在确定文献中认知损害程度最大的认知测试,利用这些信息来确定专为精神分裂症开发的测量和治疗研究以改善认知(MATRICS)共识认知测试(MCCB)是否适用于双相情感障碍研究,并提出初步的认知测试组合用于双相情感障碍研究。

方法

该项目由国际双相情感障碍学会主持,委员会成员由在双相情感障碍认知方面具有国际专业知识的研究人员组成。为了确定在双相情感障碍中表现出最大损害程度的认知任务,我们回顾了评估双相情感障碍认知功能(包括社会认知)的文献。我们进一步简要综述了精神分裂症和双相情感障碍之间的认知重叠,并评估了 MCCB 中包含的任务(或其他已确定的任务)在多大程度上可用于双相情感障碍。

结果

基于双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷模式相似但程度较轻的证据,判断 MCCB 的大多数子测试似乎都适用于双相情感障碍。除了 MCCB 测试外,其他特定的复杂言语学习测试(例如,加利福尼亚言语学习测试)或执行功能测试(Stroop 测试、连线测试 B、威斯康星卡片分类测试)也显示出在双相情感障碍中存在明显的损伤。

结论

我们的分析表明,MCCB 代表了评估双相情感障碍研究中认知缺陷的良好起点,但在评估双相情感障碍中的认知障碍时,还应考虑其他任务,包括更复杂的言语学习测试和执行功能测试。还提出了一些需要在双相情感障碍中进一步研究的有前途的认知任务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验