Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中的候诊名单管理:骨科患者综述

Waiting list management in general practice: a review of orthopaedic patients.

作者信息

Elwyn G J, Williams L A, Barry S, Kinnersley P

机构信息

Four Elms Medical Centre, Cardiff.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Apr 6;312(7035):887-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7035.887.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review all patients on a current general practice orthopaedic waiting list for outpatient appointments with regard to accuracy of the list, clinical priority, and need for further radiological investigation before hospital attendance.

DESIGN

Record review by one general practitioner and a radiologist, and discussion with patients of management alternatives.

SETTING

Six partner city centre urban fund-holding general practice, list size 8651 (29% low deprivation payment status).

SUBJECTS

116 adults on an orthopaedic waiting list.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

List accuracy (patient details and status on waiting list); clinical priority (severity of condition); further investigations (results of tests after radiological review).

RESULTS

32 patients (28%) were removed from the waiting list because of inaccuracies. 14 patients were considered to be high priority and referred to other hospitals by utilising waiting list initiative funds. Of these patients, five agreed to referral to another hospital (treatment completed on average within three months of rereferral), six did not wish to be rereferred, and two did not attend to discuss the offer and remained on the original waiting list. One prioritised patient had further radiological investigations, was reassured, and was taken off the waiting list. 10 patients had further investigations. These resulted in six patients being referred to other hospitals, three being taken off the waiting list, and one seeking private care.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic review of patients on an orthopaedic waiting list of one general practice, though time consuming, led to the identification of inaccuracies in the list and changes in management. Costs need further evaluation, but if the findings occur widely substantial benefits could be achieved for patients.

摘要

目的

对目前综合诊疗骨科门诊预约等候名单上的所有患者进行审查,内容包括名单的准确性、临床优先级以及在就诊前是否需要进一步的影像学检查。

设计

由一名全科医生和一名放射科医生进行记录审查,并与患者讨论管理方案。

地点

一家有六名合伙人的市中心城市基金持有型综合诊疗机构,名单规模为8651人(29%为低贫困支付状态)。

研究对象

骨科等候名单上的116名成年人。

主要观察指标

名单准确性(患者详细信息及在等候名单上的状态);临床优先级(病情严重程度);进一步检查(影像学检查后的检查结果)。

结果

32名患者(28%)因信息不准确被从等候名单中移除。14名患者被认为具有高优先级,并利用等候名单倡议基金转至其他医院。在这些患者中,5名同意转至其他医院(重新转诊后平均三个月内完成治疗),6名不希望重新转诊,2名未前来讨论提议并仍留在原等候名单上。一名优先患者进行了进一步的影像学检查,得到安抚后被从等候名单中移除。10名患者进行了进一步检查。结果6名患者被转至其他医院,3名被从等候名单中移除,1名寻求私人医疗服务。

结论

对一家综合诊疗机构骨科等候名单上的患者进行系统审查,虽然耗时,但能发现名单中的不准确之处并改变管理方式。成本需要进一步评估,但如果这些结果普遍存在,可为患者带来巨大益处。

相似文献

2
General practice orthopaedic outpatient referrals in North Staffordshire.北斯塔福德郡的全科骨科门诊转诊
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 12;287(6403):1439-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6403.1439.
3
Variations in clinical decisions: a study of orthopaedic patients.
Public Health. 1991 Sep;105(5):351-5. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80594-3.
5
Shortening waiting lists in orthopaedic surgery outpatient clinics.缩短骨科手术门诊的等候名单。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Mar 6;284(6317):728-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6317.728.
6
Review of an orthopaedic in-patient waiting list.
Health Trends. 1984 Feb;16(1):14-5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Waiting lists. Life in the slow lane.
Health Serv J. 1995 May 25;105(5454):24-6.
2
Queues for cure?排队治疗?
BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):818-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.818.
3
Broken NHS appointments: millions wasted?
Lancet. 1984 Jun 23;1(8391):1419. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91924-x.
6
On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.在俄勒冈小道上:医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验