• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导与权力之间的基本紧张关系:当领导者为了自身利益而牺牲团队目标时。

The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):482-97. doi: 10.1037/a0018559.

DOI:10.1037/a0018559
PMID:20649369
Abstract

Throughout human history, leaders have been responsible for helping groups attain important goals. Ideally, leaders use their power to steer groups toward desired outcomes. However, leaders can also use their power in the service of self-interest rather than effective leadership. Five experiments identified factors within both the person and the social context that determine whether leaders wield their power to promote group goals versus self-interest. In most cases, leaders behaved in a manner consistent with group goals. However, when their power was tenuous due to instability within the hierarchy, leaders high (but not low) in dominance motivation prioritized their own power over group goals: They withheld valuable information from the group, excluded a highly skilled group member, and prevented a proficient group member from having any influence over a group task. These self-interested actions were eliminated when the group was competing against a rival outgroup. Findings provide important insight into factors that influence the way leaders navigate the essential tension between leadership and power.

摘要

纵观人类历史,领导者一直肩负着帮助群体实现重要目标的重任。理想情况下,领导者利用权力引导群体朝着期望的结果前进。然而,领导者也可以将权力用于谋取私利,而不是进行有效的领导。五项实验确定了个人和社会环境中的因素,这些因素决定了领导者是利用权力来促进群体目标还是自身利益。在大多数情况下,领导者的行为与群体目标一致。然而,当领导者由于层级内部的不稳定而权力脆弱时,高(但不是低)支配动机的领导者会将自己的权力置于群体目标之上:他们向群体隐瞒有价值的信息,排斥一名高技能的群体成员,并阻止一名熟练的群体成员对群体任务产生任何影响。当群体与竞争对手进行对抗时,这些出于自身利益的行为就会消失。这些发现为影响领导者在领导力和权力之间的基本紧张关系中做出决策的因素提供了重要的见解。

相似文献

1
The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest.领导与权力之间的基本紧张关系:当领导者为了自身利益而牺牲团队目标时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):482-97. doi: 10.1037/a0018559.
2
On keeping your enemies close: powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power threats.与敌人保持亲近:有权势的领导者寻求与内群体权力威胁的接近。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):576-91. doi: 10.1037/a0025755. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
How leaders self-regulate their task performance: evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain.领导者如何自我调节任务表现:权力促进勤奋、枯竭和轻视的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):47-65. doi: 10.1037/a0020932.
4
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
5
Leadership: a new perspective.领导力:一种新视角。
J Nurs Manag. 2004 May;12(3):217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2003.00450.x.
6
Leadership behaviours that foster nursing group power.培养护理团队力量的领导行为。
J Nurs Manag. 2004 Jul;12(4):246-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00423.x.
7
Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities.高度支配欲、高度专制的性格。
J Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;144(4):421-47. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.4.421-448.
8
Divide and conquer: when and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group.分而治之:领导者何时以及为何会破坏其团队的凝聚力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Dec;107(6):1033-50. doi: 10.1037/a0038201.
9
Psychological distance and group judgments: the effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals.心理距离与群体判断:身体距离对共同目标信念的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Oct;35(10):1330-41. doi: 10.1177/0146167209340905. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
10
Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: high social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers.威权动态与不道德决策:高社会支配取向领导者与高右翼威权主义追随者
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):67-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.67.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk-taking influences perceived dominance, prestige, and leadership endorsement in Japanese adults.冒险行为会影响日本成年人对他人支配地位、威望和领导力的认可。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 23;16:1529892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1529892. eCollection 2025.
2
Power shapes power construal: the mediating role of entitlement.权力塑造权力认知:权利感的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1459405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1459405. eCollection 2024.
3
Serve Yourself or Serve Your Students? How and When Supervisor Narcissism is Related to Mental Health of Graduate Students.
服务自己还是服务学生?导师自恋如何以及何时与研究生心理健康相关。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 15;17:3555-3571. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S480313. eCollection 2024.
4
The nature of status: Navigating the varied approaches to conceptualizing and measuring status.地位的本质:探索概念化和衡量地位的多样方法。
Organ Psychol Rev. 2024 May;14(2):204-237. doi: 10.1177/20413866231220505. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
Students' School and Psychological Adjustment in Classrooms with Positive and Negative Leaders.学生在积极和消极领导者的课堂中的学校和心理调整。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Mar;53(3):550-562. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01937-w. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
6
What does it mean to follow? A critique of the followership literature and a conceptual model of the emergence of downward following.追随意味着什么?对追随文献的批判以及向下追随产生的概念模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1072800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1072800. eCollection 2023.
7
The benefits of prosocial power motivation in leadership: Action orientation fosters a win-win.亲社会权力动机在领导力中的益处:行动导向促进双赢。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0287394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287394. eCollection 2023.
8
Reaching the top but not feeling on top of the world: Examining women's internalized power threats.登上巅峰却未感到无比幸福:审视女性内心的权力威胁。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:931314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931314. eCollection 2022.
9
A framework for managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: addressing tensions and enhancing capacity outcomes.管理卫生研究能力加强联盟的框架:解决紧张关系和提高能力成果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Oct;7(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009472.
10
In-Organization Ethics Power-Allocation Mechanisms and Members' Decision-Making Behavior.组织内部的伦理权力分配机制与成员的决策行为
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/bs12010006.