• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病特异性计划干预对代理人理解患者未来医疗治疗目标的影响。

Effect of a disease-specific planning intervention on surrogate understanding of patient goals for future medical treatment.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul;58(7):1233-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02760.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02760.x
PMID:20649686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2964863/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a disease-specific planning process can improve surrogate understanding of goals of patients with life-limiting illnesses for future medical treatments.

DESIGN

A multisite randomized controlled trial conducted between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2007.

SETTING

Six outpatient clinics of large community or university health systems in three Wisconsin cities.

PARTICIPANTS

Competent, English-speaking adults aged 18 and older with chronic congestive heart failure or chronic renal disease and their surrogate decision-makers.

INTERVENTION

Trained health professionals conducted a structured, patient-centered interview intended to promote informed decision-making and to result in the completion of a document clarifying the goals of the patient with regard to four disease-specific health outcome situations and the degree of decision-making latitude granted to the surrogate.

MEASUREMENTS

Surrogate understanding of patient goals for care with regard to four expected, disease-specific outcomes situations and of the degree of surrogate latitude in decision-making.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirteen patient-surrogate pairs completed the study. As measured according to kappa scores and in all four situations and in the degree of latitude, intervention group surrogates demonstrated a significantly higher degree of understanding of patient goals than control group surrogates. Intervention group kappa scores ranged from 0.61 to 0.78, whereas control group kappa scores ranged from 0.07 to 0.28.

CONCLUSION

Surrogates in the intervention group had a significantly better understanding of patient goals and preferences than surrogates in the control group. This finding is the first step toward ensuring that patient goals for care are known and honored.

摘要

目的

确定特定疾病的规划过程是否可以提高代理人对患有绝症的患者未来医疗治疗目标的理解。

设计

2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2007 年 7 月 31 日进行的多地点随机对照试验。

地点

威斯康星州三个城市的六个大型社区或大学卫生系统的门诊诊所。

参与者

有能力、讲英语、年龄在 18 岁及以上的慢性充血性心力衰竭或慢性肾脏疾病患者及其代理人。

干预措施

经过培训的卫生专业人员进行了一项结构化的、以患者为中心的访谈,旨在促进知情决策,并完成一份文件,阐明患者在四个特定疾病的健康结果情况下的治疗目标以及代理人在决策中的自由度。

测量

代理人对患者在四个预期的特定疾病结果情况下的护理目标的理解程度,以及代理人在决策中的自由度。

结果

313 对患者-代理人对完成了研究。根据 Kappa 评分和所有四个情况以及决策自由度的评分,干预组代理人对患者目标的理解程度明显高于对照组代理人。干预组的 Kappa 评分范围为 0.61 至 0.78,而对照组的 Kappa 评分范围为 0.07 至 0.28。

结论

干预组的代理人对患者的目标和偏好的理解明显优于对照组的代理人。这一发现是确保患者的护理目标被了解和尊重的第一步。

相似文献

1
Effect of a disease-specific planning intervention on surrogate understanding of patient goals for future medical treatment.疾病特异性计划干预对代理人理解患者未来医疗治疗目标的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul;58(7):1233-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02760.x.
2
Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.透析中的预先护理计划与临终决策:一项针对患者及其代理人的随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):813-22. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
Patient-centered advance care planning in special patient populations: a pilot study.特殊患者群体中以患者为中心的预先护理计划:一项试点研究。
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.001.
4
Process and impact of an advance care planning intervention evaluated by bereaved surrogate decision-makers of dialysis patients.由透析患者的丧亲替代决策者评估的预先护理计划干预措施的过程与影响。
Palliat Med. 2017 Mar;31(3):267-274. doi: 10.1177/0269216316652012. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
5
The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making.确定亲人在生命末期决策中角色偏好的试验(TAILORED):一项改善代理决策的随机对照试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Oct;54(4):455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
6
FAmily CEntered (FACE) advance care planning: Study design and methods for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for patients with HIV/AIDS and their surrogate decision-makers.以家庭为中心的(FACE)预先护理计划:针对艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者及其替代决策者的以患者为中心的沟通与决策干预措施的研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
7
Effect of a disease-specific advance care planning intervention on end-of-life care.疾病特异性预先医疗照护计划干预对临终关怀的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 May;60(5):946-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03917.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
An Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in ESRD.终末期肾病患者和照护者的预先医疗照护计划观点访谈研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):216-224. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
9
Engagement in Advance Care Planning and Surrogates' Knowledge of Patients' Treatment Goals.参与预先护理计划及代理人对患者治疗目标的了解。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1712-1718. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14858. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
Effects of an intervention to improve communication about end-of-life care among African Americans with chronic kidney disease.一项旨在改善非裔美国慢性肾脏病患者临终关怀沟通的干预措施的效果
Appl Nurs Res. 2010 May;23(2):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2008.05.002. Epub 2009 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitated Versus Patient-Directed Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期癌症患者中促进式与患者主导的预先护理计划:一项随机临床试验
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Mar 19:OP2500046. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00046.
2
Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India.终末期肾病患者对预先医疗计划的偏好:印度一家三级医疗中心肾科医疗服务提供者的横断面调查
Nephron. 2025;149(1):48-56. doi: 10.1159/000541347. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.

本文引用的文献

1
Who will speak for me? Improving end-of-life decision-making for adolescents with HIV and their families.谁会为我发声?改善感染艾滋病毒青少年及其家庭的临终决策。
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e199-206. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2379.
2
Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment.临终讨论、患者心理健康、临终医疗护理与照顾者丧亲之痛调适之间的关联。
JAMA. 2008 Oct 8;300(14):1665-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.14.1665.
3
Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: a systematic review and multi-level analysis.
面向未来的工具:对用于预先医疗护理计划的患者端工具的范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of interactive web-based tools to stimulate reflection and communication about advance care planning with people with dementia and their family caregivers.评估交互式网络工具,以激发痴呆症患者及其家属照顾者对预先护理计划的思考和沟通。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 28;23(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01486-4.
5
A communication intervention to improve prognostic understanding and engagement in advance care planning among diverse advanced cancer patient-caregiver dyads: A pilot study.一种沟通干预措施,旨在提高不同晚期癌症患者-照护者对预后的理解和参与度,以促进预先医疗照护计划的制定:一项试点研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Feb;22(1):10-18. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000901.
6
Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.生命终末期患者的医护人员实施预先医疗照护计划的经验和观点:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 May 6;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01176-7.
7
What Counts as a Surrogate Decision?何为代理人决策?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Feb;41(2):125-132. doi: 10.1177/10499091231168976. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Interventions for improving health literacy in people with chronic kidney disease.干预措施以提高慢性肾脏病患者的健康素养。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):CD012026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012026.pub2.
9
Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement.严重呼吸系统疾病患者的照护延续链中的舒缓医疗:美国胸科学会/美国临终关怀与姑息医学学会/美国护士麻醉师协会/世界卫生组织姑息治疗联盟政策声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):e44-e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202207-1262ST.
10
"I decide myself"- A qualitative exploration of end of life decision making processes of patients and caregivers through Advance Care Planning.“我自己做决定”- 通过预先医疗照护计划探索患者和照护者的临终决策过程。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0252598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252598. eCollection 2021.
评估促进老年人预先医疗指示干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价和多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(7):1122-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jul 20.
4
Health literacy not race predicts end-of-life care preferences.健康素养而非种族决定临终关怀偏好。
J Palliat Med. 2008 Jun;11(5):754-62. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0224.
5
Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives.控制死亡:预先指示的虚假承诺。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 3;147(1):51-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00008.
6
The effectiveness of interventions to increase advance directive completion rates.提高预立医疗指示完成率的干预措施的有效性。
J Aging Health. 2007 Jun;19(3):519-36. doi: 10.1177/0898264307300198.
7
Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care.一份评估临终关怀沟通情况的沟通质量问卷的心理测量学特征。
J Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;9(5):1086-98. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1086.
8
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.替代决策者的准确性:一项系统综述。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
9
Hope for the future: achieving the original intent of advance directives.对未来的期望:实现预先指示的初衷。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 Nov-Dec;Spec No:S26-30. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2005.0093.
10
A randomized, controlled trial to improve advance care planning among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.一项旨在改善心脏手术患者预先医疗计划的随机对照试验。
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):1049-53. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178192.10283.b4.