• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对概率术语的理解。

Patients' interpretations of probability terms.

作者信息

Mazur D J, Hickam D H

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR 97207.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1991 May-Jun;6(3):237-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02598968.

DOI:10.1007/BF02598968
PMID:2066829
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the meaning ascribed by patients to qualitative expressions of probability commonly used in medical care and to determine patient preferences for obtaining information when communicating with their physicians about medical risk numerically and/or qualitatively.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients.

SETTING

A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

133 patients sequentially seen in a general medicine clinic.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Subjects were given a randomly ordered list of 12 common terms, each a qualitative expression of probability. They were asked to indicate what they understood to be the numerical meaning of each word. The patients' probability estimates were found to comprise two groups of five terms each, with high intercorrelations among the probabilities assigned to the terms in each group. Mean probabilities assigned to terms in the first group all were greater than 60%, and mean probabilities assigned to terms in the second group all were below 50%. When asked whether they wanted chance information to be provided in numerical or qualitative terms, 32% reported that they wanted it only numerically; 35.3% wanted it only qualitatively; 21.8% wanted the information either way; and 8.3% wanted the information both ways.

CONCLUSIONS

The numerical meanings that patients ascribe to probability terms fall into identifiable patterns. While patients vary in the actual values they assign to terms, the relative meanings of terms show consistent trends.

摘要

研究目的

评估患者赋予医疗中常用概率定性表述的含义,并确定患者在与医生交流医疗风险时对以数字和/或定性方式获取信息的偏好。

设计

对连续患者进行横断面调查。

地点

一家大学附属退伍军人事务医疗中心。

参与者

133名在普通内科门诊依次就诊的患者。

测量与主要结果

受试者被给予一份随机排序的包含12个常用术语的列表,每个术语都是概率的定性表述。他们被要求指出他们认为每个词的数字含义是什么。发现患者的概率估计分为两组,每组五个术语,每组中各术语的概率之间具有高度相关性。第一组术语的平均概率均大于60%,第二组术语的平均概率均低于50%。当被问及他们希望以数字还是定性方式获得概率信息时,32%的人表示他们只想以数字方式获得;35.3%的人只想以定性方式获得;21.8%的人希望两种方式都可以;8.3%的人希望两种方式都要。

结论

患者赋予概率术语的数字含义呈现出可识别的模式。虽然患者赋予各术语的实际数值有所不同,但各术语的相对含义呈现出一致的趋势。

相似文献

1
Patients' interpretations of probability terms.患者对概率术语的理解。
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 May-Jun;6(3):237-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02598968.
2
How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms.年龄、结果严重程度和量表如何影响普通内科门诊患者对口头概率术语的理解。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):268-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02599654.
3
Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures.患者对风险披露的偏好以及在侵入性医疗程序决策中的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Feb;12(2):114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00016.x.
4
Interpretation of and preference for probability expressions among Japanese patients and physicians.日本患者和医生对概率表述的理解与偏好
Fam Pract. 2002 Feb;19(1):7-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.1.7.
5
Communicating probabilistic information to cancer patients: is there 'noise' on the line?
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):725-31. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90152-3.
6
How patients' preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty: asymptomatic localized prostate cancer.在高风险和高治疗不确定性的情况下,即无症状局限性前列腺癌,患者对风险信息的偏好如何影响治疗选择。
Med Decis Making. 1999 Oct-Dec;19(4):394-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900407.
7
Patients' interpretations of verbal expressions of probability: implications for securing informed consent to medical interventions.患者对概率性言语表达的理解:对确保医疗干预获得知情同意的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 1994 Autumn;12(4):417-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370120410.
8
Patients' interpretation of qualitative probability statements.患者对定性概率陈述的理解。
Arch Fam Med. 1994 Nov;3(11):961-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.11.961.
9
Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation.知情同意诉讼中概率的语言表达。
Med Decis Making. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4):273-81. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9101100405.
10
The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.概率估计的定性与定量呈现方式对患者决策的影响:一项随机试验。
Health Expect. 2002 Sep;5(3):246-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00188.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy Planning and Genetic Testing: Exploring Advantages, and Challenges.备孕与基因检测:探讨其优势与挑战。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;15(9):1205. doi: 10.3390/genes15091205.
2
A nonparametric Bayesian method of translating machine learning scores to probabilities in clinical decision support.一种在临床决策支持中将机器学习评分转换为概率的非参数贝叶斯方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 7;18(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1736-3.
3
Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Expressions of probability: words and numbers.概率的表达:文字与数字。
N Engl J Med. 1980 Feb 14;302(7):411. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198002143020718.
2
Between never and always.
N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 29;305(18):1097-8.
3
Numbers are better than words. Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine.
Am J Med. 1983 Jun;74(6):1061-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90819-7.
4
Cochrane系统评价用户中标准格式与新的替代格式的研究结果总结表之间的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Apr 16;16:164. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0649-6.
4
Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.在基因组医学时代传播常见疾病的遗传风险信息。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:491-513. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722.
5
Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications when sharing the documents with patients.规避风险:临床文档中不确定性术语的使用及其在与患者共享文档时的潜在影响。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:321-30. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
6
Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study.代理人决策人对预后信息的解读:一项混合方法研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):360-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00008.
7
'I'll do what they did": social norm information and cancer treatment decisions.“我会照他们那样做”: 社会规范信息与癌症治疗决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.031. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
8
Numeracy and framing bias in epilepsy.癫痫的计算能力和框架偏差。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
9
A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.一项在重症监护病房中向替代决策人透露预后的两种方法的随机试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct 1;182(7):905-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201002-0262OC. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
10
The language of prognostication in intensive care units.重症监护病房中的预后预测语言。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):76-83. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08317012. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
What do we mean by "usually"?
我们所说的“通常”是什么意思?
Lancet. 1980 May 17;1(8177):1094. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91544-5.
5
How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.医学专业人员如何评估概率表述。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 18;315(12):740-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609183151206.
6
Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: treatise on informed consent for the primary care physician.为何知情同意的目标未能实现:给初级保健医生的知情同意论述
J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Jul-Aug;3(4):370-80. doi: 10.1007/BF02595796.
7
Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a study of elderly outpatients.讨论心肺复苏:一项针对老年门诊患者的研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Jul-Aug;3(4):317-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02595786.
8
Personal risk factors. What do they mean?个人风险因素。它们是什么意思?
Cancer. 1988 Oct 15;62(8 Suppl):1695-701. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881015)62:1+<1695::aid-cncr2820621307>3.0.co;2-r.
9
Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential.利用乳腺X线摄影术进行癌症控制:一种未实现的潜力。
CA Cancer J Clin. 1987 Jan-Feb;37(1):33-48. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.37.1.33.