Suppr超能文献

颈项痛与残疾量表的变化敏感性。

Sensitivity to change of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):882-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1545-0. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

Abstract

The Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) is a 20-item instrument to measure neck pain and related disability. The aim of this study was to assess sensitivity to change of the NPAD. A total of 411 participants from 15 general practices in the middle of Germany completed a multidimensional questionnaire including the German version of the NPAD and self-reported demographic and clinical information. Sensitivity to change was analysed by linear regression analysis of the NPAD at follow-up and educational level, age class, depression, anxiety, and deficits in social support, respectively, and by Pearson's correlation analyses between mean change in NPAD at follow-up and mean change in prognostic markers. Those having more than basic education (regression coefficient -7.2, p < 0.001) and/or being in a younger age class (-2.9, p = 0.020) consistently reported significantly lower average NPAD scores at follow-up compared to those with basic education and/or a older age class. In contrast, those who were classified to be depressed (regression coefficient 2.1, p < 0.001), anxious (1.9, p < 0.001), or having deficits in social support (5.5, p = 0.004) reported significantly higher NPAD scores. Change in depression, anxiety, and social support scale between baseline and follow-up was significantly correlated with change in the NPAD score. Hence, these data are in the direction anticipated across all baseline factors investigated. In conclusion, the NPAD seems to be a sensitive measure for use in clinical practice and future studies of neck pain and related disability.

摘要

颈痛和残疾量表(NPAD)是一种包含 20 个项目的工具,用于测量颈痛和相关残疾。本研究旨在评估 NPAD 的变化敏感性。共有来自德国中部 15 家普通诊所的 411 名参与者完成了一份多维问卷,包括德国版 NPAD 和自我报告的人口统计学和临床信息。通过线性回归分析 NPAD 在随访时和教育水平、年龄组、抑郁、焦虑以及社会支持不足方面的变化敏感性,以及通过 NPAD 在随访时的平均变化与预后标志物的平均变化之间的 Pearson 相关分析来评估变化敏感性。那些受过基本以上教育的人(回归系数-7.2,p<0.001)和/或年龄较轻的人(-2.9,p=0.020)在随访时报告的 NPAD 平均评分明显低于受过基本教育和/或年龄较大的人。相比之下,那些被诊断为抑郁(回归系数 2.1,p<0.001)、焦虑(1.9,p<0.001)或社会支持不足(5.5,p=0.004)的人报告的 NPAD 评分明显更高。基线和随访之间抑郁、焦虑和社会支持量表的变化与 NPAD 评分的变化显著相关。因此,这些数据与所有基线因素的预期方向一致。总之,NPAD 似乎是一种在临床实践和未来颈痛及相关残疾研究中敏感的测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a19/3099161/49a662eec510/586_2010_1545_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验