• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术。

Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 14;16(30):3811-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i30.3811.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v16.i30.3811
PMID:20698044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2921093/
Abstract

Esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) might theoretically decrease this rate. We reviewed the current literature on MIE, with a focus on the available techniques, outcomes and comparison with open surgery. This review shows that the available literature on MIE is still crowded with heterogeneous studies with different techniques. There are no controlled and randomized trials, and the few retrospective comparative cohort studies are limited by small numbers of patients and biased by historical controls of open surgery. Based on the available literature, there is no evidence that MIE brings clear benefits compared to conventional esophagectomy. Increasing experience and the report of larger series might change this scenario.

摘要

食管切除术与高发病率和死亡率相关。微创食管切除术(MIE)可能从理论上降低这一比率。我们对 MIE 的现有文献进行了回顾,重点关注现有技术、结果以及与开放手术的比较。这一综述表明,MIE 的现有文献仍然充斥着不同技术的异质性研究。没有对照和随机试验,少数回顾性队列比较研究也受到开放手术历史对照的影响,存在偏倚。基于现有文献,没有证据表明 MIE 与传统的食管切除术相比有明显的优势。随着经验的增加和更大系列的报告,这种情况可能会改变。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 14;16(30):3811-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i30.3811.
2
Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.从杂交手术转变为完全微创和机器人辅助食管切除术是可行的,且不会有任何妥协。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;67(7):589-596. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670664. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术的生存率相当:基于国家癌症数据库的分析
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(2):244-253. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies.连续 100 例微创食管切除术的发病率和死亡率降低。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):162-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1846-3. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.食管癌切除术微创与开放手术对比:文献系统综述
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):135-46.
6
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT 试验)。
Trials. 2012 Nov 30;13:230. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-230.
7
Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.支持采用微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的证据:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2012 Aug;147(8):768-76. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1326.
8
A critical review of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的批判性综述。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Aug;22(4):310-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182582d2c.
9
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗癌症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33.
10
The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.胸腔镜与腹腔镜联合手术对可切除食管癌患者根治性食管切除术后肺部并发症的影响
Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2399-404.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of surgical complications using single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation and artificial carbon dioxide pneumothorax in esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.单腔气管插管联合人工二氧化碳气胸在食管癌切除术中改善手术并发症的Meta分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01459-1.
2
Laparoscopic surgery: A qualified systematic review.腹腔镜手术:一项合格的系统评价。
World J Methodol. 2015 Dec 26;5(4):238-54. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.238.
3
Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.微创McKeown食管癌切除术的最新经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12873-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12873.
4
Impact of artificial capnothorax on coagulation in patients during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma.人工气胸对鳞状细胞癌患者在电视辅助胸腔镜食管切除术中凝血功能的影响
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2766-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4549-3. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
5
Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer - benefits and controversies.食管癌的微创手术——益处与争议
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2014 Jun;11(2):151-5. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2014.43842. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
6
Transhiatal Esophagectomy without Mediastinal Manipulation for Lower Third Esophageal and Cardial Cancers: The First Experience of a New Technique.经裂孔食管切除术治疗食管下段和贲门癌:一种新技术的首次经验。
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):89-93.
7
Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is debatable.食管癌扩大淋巴结清扫术存在争议。
World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1757-67. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2018-5.
8
Multidisciplinary approach for patients with esophageal cancer.食管癌的多学科治疗方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6737-46. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6737.
9
Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies.微创食管切除术的回顾与当前争议。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:683213. doi: 10.1155/2012/683213. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
10
Should esophageal resections for cancer be performed in high-volume centers only?食管癌切除术是否应仅在高容量中心进行?
Updates Surg. 2011 Sep;63(3):147-50. doi: 10.1007/s13304-011-0090-7. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌的最佳淋巴结清扫术。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee.
2
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.腹腔镜下胃癌D2淋巴结清扫全胃切除术
Arch Surg. 2009 Dec;144(12):1138-42. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.223.
3
The role of laparoscopy for gastric surgery in the West.腹腔镜在西方的胃外科手术中的作用。
Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(3):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s10120-008-0516-1. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
4
The evolution of robotic general surgery.机器人普通外科手术的发展
Scand J Surg. 2009;98(2):125-9. doi: 10.1177/145749690909800208.
5
Prospective randomized controlled study on the effects of perioperative administration of a neutrophil elastase inhibitor to patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer.前瞻性随机对照研究围手术期给予中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶抑制剂对接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸段食管癌患者的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2010 May;23(4):329-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01010.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
6
Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.对加利福尼亚州重大癌症手术死亡率与医院手术量之间关系的认识是否产生了影响?:另一个十年的随访分析。
Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):472-83. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b47c79.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜翻转食管切除术与开放经裂孔食管切除术治疗高级别异型增生和Ⅰ期食管腺癌的比较
Arch Surg. 2009 Jul;144(7):679-84. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.113.
8
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer.机器人辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术治疗癌症
Br J Surg. 2009 Aug;96(8):878-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6647.
9
Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons.基于术者手术量的食管癌治疗趋势:618 位食管外科医生的治疗实践。
Dis Esophagus. 2010 Feb;23(2):136-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00985.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
10
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗癌症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33.