Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6639-44. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01268-10. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
The genotyping of numerous isolates of Cryptosporidium parasites has led to the definition of new species and a better understanding of the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis. A single-locus genotyping method based on the partial sequence of a polymorphic sporozoite surface glycoprotein gene (GP60) has been favored by many for surveying Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis populations. Since genetically distinct Cryptosporidium parasites recombine in nature, it is unclear whether single-locus classifications can adequately represent intraspecies diversity. To address this question, we investigated whether multilocus genotypes of C. parvum and C. hominis cluster according to the GP60 genotype. C. hominis multilocus genotypes did not segregate according to this marker, indicating that for this species the GP60 sequence is not a valid surrogate for multilocus typing methods. In contrast, in C. parvum the previously described "anthroponotic" genotype was confirmed as a genetically distinct subspecies cluster characterized by a diagnostic GP60 allele. However, as in C. hominis, several C. parvum GP60 alleles did not correlate with distinct subpopulations. Given the rarity of some C. parvum GP60 alleles in our sample, the existence of additional C. parvum subgroups with unique GP60 alleles cannot be ruled out. We conclude that with the exception of genotypically distinct C. parvum subgroups, multilocus genotyping methods are needed to characterize C. parvum and C. hominis populations. Unless parasite virulence is controlled at the GP60 locus, attempts to find associations within species or subspecies between GP60 and phenotype are unlikely to be successful.
对大量隐孢子虫寄生虫分离株的基因分型导致了新物种的定义,并更好地了解了隐孢子虫病的流行病学。一种基于多态性裂殖体表面糖蛋白基因(GP60)部分序列的单基因座基因分型方法已被许多人用于调查小隐孢子虫和人隐孢子虫种群。由于遗传上不同的隐孢子虫寄生虫在自然界中重组,因此尚不清楚单基因座分类是否能充分代表种内多样性。为了解决这个问题,我们调查了小隐孢子虫和人隐孢子虫的多基因座基因型是否根据 GP60 基因型聚类。人隐孢子虫的多基因座基因型并未根据该标记分离,表明对于该物种,GP60 序列不是多基因座分型方法的有效替代物。相比之下,在小隐孢子虫中,先前描述的“人源型”基因型被确认为具有独特 GP60 等位基因的遗传上不同的亚种聚类。然而,与人隐孢子虫一样,几个小隐孢子虫 GP60 等位基因与不同的亚群没有相关性。鉴于我们样本中小隐孢子虫 GP60 等位基因的稀有性,不能排除存在具有独特 GP60 等位基因的其他小隐孢子虫亚群。我们的结论是,除了遗传上明显不同的小隐孢子虫亚群外,还需要多基因座基因分型方法来描述小隐孢子虫和人隐孢子虫种群。除非寄生虫毒力在 GP60 基因座得到控制,否则尝试在物种或亚种内将 GP60 与表型之间建立关联不太可能成功。