Gulbinaite Rasa, van Viegen Tara, Wieling Martijn, Cohen Michael X, VanRullen Rufin
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Toulouse 31000, France,
Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse 31052, France.
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 18;37(42):10173-10184. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1163-17.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Rhythmic visual stimulation ("flicker") is primarily used to "tag" processing of low-level visual and high-level cognitive phenomena. However, preliminary evidence suggests that flicker may also entrain endogenous brain oscillations, thereby modulating cognitive processes supported by those brain rhythms. Here we tested the interaction between 10 Hz flicker and endogenous alpha-band (∼10 Hz) oscillations during a selective visuospatial attention task. We recorded EEG from human participants (both genders) while they performed a modified Eriksen flanker task in which distractors and targets flickered within (10 Hz) or outside (7.5 or 15 Hz) the alpha band. By using a combination of EEG source separation, time-frequency, and single-trial linear mixed-effects modeling, we demonstrate that 10 Hz flicker interfered with stimulus processing more on incongruent than congruent trials (high vs low selective attention demands). Crucially, the effect of 10 Hz flicker on task performance was predicted by the distance between 10 Hz and individual alpha peak frequency (estimated during the task). Finally, the flicker effect on task performance was more strongly predicted by EEG flicker responses during stimulus processing than during preparation for the upcoming stimulus, suggesting that 10 Hz flicker interfered more with reactive than proactive selective attention. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis that visual flicker entrained endogenous alpha-band networks, which in turn impaired task performance. Our findings also provide novel evidence for frequency-dependent exogenous modulation of cognition that is determined by the correspondence between the exogenous flicker frequency and the endogenous brain rhythms. Here we provide novel evidence that the interaction between exogenous rhythmic visual stimulation and endogenous brain rhythms can have frequency-specific behavioral effects. We show that alpha-band (10 Hz) flicker impairs stimulus processing in a selective attention task when the stimulus flicker rate matches individual alpha peak frequency. The effect of sensory flicker on task performance was stronger when selective attention demands were high, and was stronger during stimulus processing and response selection compared with the prestimulus anticipatory period. These findings provide novel evidence that frequency-specific sensory flicker affects online attentional processing, and also demonstrate that the correspondence between exogenous and endogenous rhythms is an overlooked prerequisite when testing for frequency-specific cognitive effects of flicker.
节律性视觉刺激(“闪烁”)主要用于“标记”低层次视觉和高层次认知现象的处理过程。然而,初步证据表明,闪烁也可能夹带内源性脑振荡,从而调节由这些脑节律支持的认知过程。在此,我们在一项选择性视觉空间注意任务中测试了10赫兹闪烁与内源性阿尔法波段(约10赫兹)振荡之间的相互作用。我们记录了人类参与者(男女皆有)在执行一项改良的埃里克森侧翼任务时的脑电图,在该任务中,干扰物和目标在阿尔法波段内(10赫兹)或外(7.5或15赫兹)闪烁。通过结合脑电图源分离、时频分析和单试次线性混合效应建模,我们证明,在不一致试验(高选择性注意需求与低选择性注意需求)中,10赫兹闪烁对刺激处理的干扰比对一致试验更大。至关重要的是,10赫兹闪烁对任务表现的影响可由10赫兹与个体阿尔法峰值频率之间的距离(在任务期间估计)预测。最后,与即将到来的刺激准备期相比,刺激处理期间的脑电图闪烁反应对任务表现的闪烁效应预测更强,这表明10赫兹闪烁对反应性选择性注意的干扰比对主动性选择性注意更大。这些发现与我们的假设一致,即视觉闪烁夹带内源性阿尔法波段网络,进而损害任务表现。我们的发现还为认知的频率依赖性外源性调节提供了新证据,这种调节由外源性闪烁频率与内源性脑节律之间的对应关系决定。在此,我们提供了新证据,表明外源性节律性视觉刺激与内源性脑节律之间的相互作用可产生频率特异性行为效应。我们表明,当刺激闪烁率与个体阿尔法峰值频率匹配时,阿尔法波段(10赫兹)闪烁会损害选择性注意任务中的刺激处理。当选择性注意需求较高时,感觉闪烁对任务表现的影响更强,并且与刺激前预期期相比,在刺激处理和反应选择期间更强。这些发现为频率特异性感觉闪烁影响在线注意力处理提供了新证据,也表明在测试闪烁的频率特异性认知效应时,外源性和内源性节律之间的对应关系是一个被忽视的前提条件。