Department of Occupational Therapy, Castle Peak Hospital, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2011 Jan;11(1):69-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00643.x. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
In view of the paucity of data on the quality of life (QOL) in Chinese Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, we investigated the effects of cognitive function and depressive mood on QOL among our Chinese AD patients in Hong Kong, using the Cantonese Chinese version of Quality of Life in Alzheimer's disease (QOL-AD).
This was a cross-sectional study. The Cantonese Chinese version of QOL-AD was adapted from the Mandarin Chinese and English versions of QOL-AD, and was administered to 111 AD patients and their caregivers.
The Cantonese Chinese version of QOL-AD showed good internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability. The patients' and caregivers' reports of QOL-AD were moderately correlated (r=0.516, P<0.001). Both QOL-AD scores from patient and caregiver reports varied significantly in relation to the severity of cognitive impairment, being lowest in the subgroup with Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 10 or less. The mean QOL-AD scores from both patient and caregiver reports were also significantly lower in the depressed (Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS] scores≥15) than non-depressed groups (GDS scores≤15) (QOL-AD patient report 23.8 and 34.2, respectively, P<0.001, Student's t-test; QOL-AD caregiver report 28.9 and 31.0, respectively, P<0.05, Student's t-test). General linear model analyses showed that only the MMSE and GDS scores were independent significant factors associated with the patient but not the caregiver reports of the QOL-AD.
Among Chinese AD patients in Hong Kong, depressive mood and low MMSE score adversely affect the QOL-AD from the patient but not the caregiver perspectives.
鉴于中文阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者生活质量(QOL)数据的缺乏,我们使用 QOL-AD 的粤语中文版本,调查了认知功能和抑郁情绪对香港中文 AD 患者 QOL 的影响。
这是一项横断面研究。QOL-AD 的粤语中文版本是从 QOL-AD 的普通话中文和英文版本改编而来的,并对 111 名 AD 患者及其护理人员进行了评估。
QOL-AD 的粤语中文版本具有良好的内部一致性、重测信度和评分者间信度。患者和护理人员对 QOL-AD 的报告具有中度相关性(r=0.516,P<0.001)。患者和护理人员报告的 QOL-AD 评分与认知障碍的严重程度显著相关,在简易精神状态检查评分≤10 的亚组中最低。来自患者和护理人员报告的 QOL-AD 评分均值在抑郁(老年抑郁量表[GDS]评分≥15)和非抑郁(GDS 评分≤15)组之间也存在显著差异(QOL-AD 患者报告分别为 23.8 和 34.2,P<0.001,学生 t 检验;QOL-AD 护理人员报告分别为 28.9 和 31.0,P<0.05,学生 t 检验)。一般线性模型分析显示,只有 MMSE 和 GDS 评分是与患者而非护理人员报告的 QOL-AD 相关的独立显著因素。
在香港的中文 AD 患者中,抑郁情绪和低 MMSE 评分会对患者而非护理人员视角的 QOL-AD 产生不利影响。