Suppr超能文献

自然照明和人工照明下人工晶状体的光谱透过率:选择合适滤光片的标准分析。

Spectral transmittance of intraocular lenses under natural and artificial illumination: criteria analysis for choosing a suitable filter.

机构信息

Fundación Oftalmológica del Mediterráneo (FOM), Bifurcación Pío Baroja-General Avilés, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2011 Jan;118(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the spectral transmission of different intraocular lenses (IOLs) with either ultraviolet (UV) or blue-light filters, and to analyze the performance of these filters with artificial light sources as well as sunlight.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

METHODS

The spectral transmission curve of 10 IOLs was measured using a PerkinElmer Lambda 800 UV/VIS spectrometer (Waltham, MA). Different filtering simulations were performed using the D65 standard illuminant as daylight and standard incandescent lamp and fluorescent bulb illuminants.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Spectral transmittance of the IOLs.

RESULTS

All the IOLs studied provide good UVC (200-280 nm) and UVB (280-315 nm) protection, except for one that presented an appreciable window at 270 nm. Nevertheless, both natural and artificial sources have practically no emission under 300 nm. In the UVA (315-380 nm) range the curves of the different IOLs manifested different degrees of absorption.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all the UV filters incorporated in different IOLs protect equally. The filters that provide greater photoprotection against UV radiation, even blue light, are yellow and orange. Then, yellow and orange IOL filters may be best suited for cases requiring special retinal protection. The filters that favor better photoreception of visible light (380-780 nm) are those that transmit this radiation close to 100%. Artificial illumination practically does not emit in the UV range, but its levels of illumination are very low when compared with solar light. A possible balance between photoprotection and photoreception could be a sharp cutoff filter with the cutoff wavelength near 400 nm and a maximum transmittance around 100%.

摘要

目的

比较具有紫外线(UV)或蓝光滤光片的不同人工晶状体(IOL)的光谱透过率,并分析这些滤光片在人工光源和阳光中的性能。

设计

实验研究。

方法

使用 PerkinElmer Lambda 800 UV/VIS 分光光度计(马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆)测量 10 个 IOL 的光谱透射曲线。使用 D65 标准照明体作为日光和标准白炽灯泡和荧光灯泡照明进行不同的过滤模拟。

主要观察指标

IOL 的光谱透过率。

结果

除了一个在 270nm 处有明显窗口的 IOL 外,所有研究的 IOL 都能很好地提供 UVC(200-280nm)和 UVB(280-315nm)保护。然而,自然和人工光源在 300nm 以下几乎没有发射。在 UVA(315-380nm)范围内,不同 IOL 的曲线表现出不同程度的吸收。

结论

并非所有包含在不同 IOL 中的 UV 滤光片都能提供同等的保护。提供对 UV 辐射(甚至蓝光)更好的光保护的滤光片是黄色和橙色的。然后,黄色和橙色的 IOL 滤光片可能最适合需要特殊视网膜保护的情况。有利于更好地接收可见光(380-780nm)的滤光片是那些接近 100%传输这种辐射的滤光片。人工照明实际上不在 UV 范围内发射,但与太阳光相比,其光照水平非常低。一种可能的光保护和光接收之间的平衡可能是具有截止波长在 400nm 左右且最大透过率在 100%左右的锐截止滤光片。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验