University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Nurs Ethics. 2010 Sep;17(5):577-89. doi: 10.1177/0969733010373009.
The aim of this study was to explore the obligations of nurses and physicians in providing end-of-life care. Nineteen nurses and 11 physicians from a single newborn intensive care unit participated. Using content analysis, an overarching obligation of creating the best possible experience for infants and parents was identified, within which two categories of obligations (decision making and the end of life itself) emerged. Obligations in decision making included talking to parents and timing withdrawal. End-of-life obligations included providing options, preparing parents, being with, advocating, creating peace and normalcy, and providing comfort. Nurses and physicians perceived obligations in both categories, although nurse obligations centered on the end of life while physician obligations focused on decision making. The findings demonstrate that, although the ultimate goal is shared by both disciplines, the paths to achieving that goal are often different. This has important implications for collaboration, communication, and improving the end of life.
本研究旨在探讨护士和医生在提供临终关怀方面的义务。来自单个新生儿重症监护病房的 19 名护士和 11 名医生参与了研究。通过内容分析,确定了为婴儿和家长创造最佳体验的首要义务,其中出现了两个类别的义务(决策和生命终末期本身)。决策中的义务包括与家长沟通和决定何时停止治疗。生命终末期的义务包括提供选择、准备家长、陪伴、倡导、营造平静和正常、提供舒适。护士和医生都认为这两个类别都有义务,但护士的义务集中在生命终末期,而医生的义务则集中在决策上。研究结果表明,尽管两个学科的最终目标是相同的,但实现这一目标的途径往往不同。这对合作、沟通和改善临终关怀有重要意义。