Cancer Research UK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Sep;64(3):914-21. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22478.
Although the biasing of R(2)* estimates by assuming magnitude MR data to be normally distributed has been described, the effect on changes in R(2)* (DeltaR(2)), such as induced by a paramagnetic contrast agent, has not been reported. In this study, two versions of a novel Bayesian maximum a posteriori approach for estimating DeltaR(2) are described and evaluated: one that assumes normally distributed data and the other, Rice-distributed data. The approach enables the robust, voxelwise determination of the uncertainty in DeltaR(2)* estimates and provides a useful statistical framework for quantifying the probability that a pixel has been significantly enhanced. This technique was evaluated in vivo, using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in orthotopic murine prostate tumors. It is shown that assuming magnitude data to be normally distributed causes DeltaR(2)* to be underestimated when signal-to-noise ratio is modest. However, the biasing effect is less than is found in R(2)* estimates, implying that the simplifying assumption of normally distributed noise is more justifiable when evaluating DeltaR(2)* compared with when evaluating precontrast R(2)* values.
虽然已经描述了通过假设磁共振数据正态分布来偏置 R(2)*估计值的情况,但尚未报道这种方法对 R(2)变化(DeltaR(2))的影响,例如由顺磁对比剂引起的变化。在这项研究中,描述并评估了两种新型贝叶斯最大后验估计 DeltaR(2)*的方法版本:一种假设数据正态分布,另一种假设 Rice 分布数据。该方法能够稳健、体素化地确定 DeltaR(2)*估计值的不确定性,并为量化像素是否显著增强提供了有用的统计框架。该技术在体内使用正位鼠前列腺肿瘤中的超小超顺磁性氧化铁颗粒进行了评估。结果表明,当信噪比适中时,假设幅度数据正态分布会导致 DeltaR(2)*被低估。然而,这种偏差效应小于 R(2)*估计值中的偏差效应,这意味着在评估 DeltaR(2)*时,与评估预对比 R(2)*值相比,简化的正态分布噪声假设更合理。