Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Nov;48(11):3923-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01006-10. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
In the Netherlands, there is an ongoing and unparalleled outbreak of Q fever. Rapid and reliable methods to identify patients infected with Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever, are urgently needed. We evaluated the performance of different DNA extraction methods and real-time PCR assays that are in use in seven diagnostic or reference laboratories in the Netherlands. A low degree of variation in the sensitivities of most of the developed real-time PCR assays was observed. However, PCR assays amplifying short DNA fragments yielded better results than those producing large DNA fragments. With regard to DNA extraction, the automated MagNA Pure Compact system and the manual QIAamp DNA mini kit consistently yielded better results than either the MagNA Pure LC system and NucliSens EasyMag (both automated) or the High Pure viral nucleic acid kit (manual). The present study shows that multiple combinations of DNA extraction kits and real-time PCR assays offer equivalent solutions to detect C. burnetii DNA in serum samples from patients suspected to have Q fever.
在荷兰,正在发生一场前所未有的 Q 热疫情。目前急需快速可靠的方法来识别感染 Q 热病原体贝氏柯克斯体的患者。我们评估了在荷兰的 7 家诊断或参考实验室中使用的不同 DNA 提取方法和实时 PCR 检测方法的性能。观察到大多数已开发的实时 PCR 检测方法的灵敏度变化程度较低。然而,扩增短 DNA 片段的 PCR 检测方法比扩增长 DNA 片段的检测方法产生了更好的结果。在 DNA 提取方面,自动化的 MagNA Pure Compact 系统和手动的 QIAamp DNA mini 试剂盒比 MagNA Pure LC 系统和 NucliSens EasyMag(均为自动化)或 High Pure 病毒核酸试剂盒(手动)更能稳定地提取出更多的有效 DNA。本研究表明,DNA 提取试剂盒和实时 PCR 检测方法的多种组合可以为检测疑似 Q 热患者血清样本中的 C. burnetii DNA 提供等效的解决方案。