• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在神经系统中进行贝叶斯计算的先验学习。

Learning priors for Bayesian computations in the nervous system.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Sep 10;5(9):e12686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012686.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0012686
PMID:20844766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2937037/
Abstract

Our nervous system continuously combines new information from our senses with information it has acquired throughout life. Numerous studies have found that human subjects manage this by integrating their observations with their previous experience (priors) in a way that is close to the statistical optimum. However, little is known about the way the nervous system acquires or learns priors. Here we present results from experiments where the underlying distribution of target locations in an estimation task was switched, manipulating the prior subjects should use. Our experimental design allowed us to measure a subject's evolving prior while they learned. We confirm that through extensive practice subjects learn the correct prior for the task. We found that subjects can rapidly learn the mean of a new prior while the variance is learned more slowly and with a variable learning rate. In addition, we found that a Bayesian inference model could predict the time course of the observed learning while offering an intuitive explanation for the findings. The evidence suggests the nervous system continuously updates its priors to enable efficient behavior.

摘要

我们的神经系统不断将来自感官的新信息与一生中获得的信息相结合。许多研究发现,人类通过将观察结果与先前的经验(先验)整合在一起,以接近统计最优的方式来实现这一点。然而,对于神经系统如何获得或学习先验的方式知之甚少。在这里,我们展示了一些实验的结果,这些实验中,在一个估计任务中,目标位置的基础分布被改变,从而操纵了受试者应该使用的先验。我们的实验设计允许我们在受试者学习的过程中测量他们不断变化的先验。我们证实,通过大量的练习,受试者可以学习到任务的正确先验。我们发现,受试者可以快速学习新先验的均值,而方差的学习速度较慢,并且学习率是可变的。此外,我们发现,贝叶斯推理模型可以预测观察到的学习过程,同时为这些发现提供了直观的解释。这些证据表明,神经系统不断更新其先验,以实现高效的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/141f1d478851/pone.0012686.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/4e91fd29fff6/pone.0012686.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/1197e2d13155/pone.0012686.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/693c21e25aa2/pone.0012686.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/fb7f50dbffa5/pone.0012686.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/2bb3c5675598/pone.0012686.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/141f1d478851/pone.0012686.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/4e91fd29fff6/pone.0012686.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/1197e2d13155/pone.0012686.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/693c21e25aa2/pone.0012686.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/fb7f50dbffa5/pone.0012686.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/2bb3c5675598/pone.0012686.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5911/2937037/141f1d478851/pone.0012686.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning priors for Bayesian computations in the nervous system.在神经系统中进行贝叶斯计算的先验学习。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 10;5(9):e12686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012686.
2
How much to trust the senses: likelihood learning.该在多大程度上信任感官:可能性学习。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 14;14(13):13. doi: 10.1167/14.13.13.
3
Generalization of prior information for rapid Bayesian time estimation.用于快速贝叶斯时间估计的先验信息泛化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):412-417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610706114. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer.我们真的是贝叶斯主义者吗?概率推理显示出次优的知识迁移。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 8;20(1):e1011769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011769. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Structural and contextual priors affect visual search in children with and without autism.结构和语境先验影响自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童的视觉搜索。
Autism Res. 2021 Jul;14(7):1484-1495. doi: 10.1002/aur.2511. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
Network Plasticity as Bayesian Inference.作为贝叶斯推理的网络可塑性
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 6;11(11):e1004485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004485. eCollection 2015 Nov.
7
Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates.进行离散数值估计时的快速准确学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 12;12(4):e1004859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004859. eCollection 2016 Apr.
8
Young children combine sensory cues with learned information in a statistically efficient manner: But task complexity matters.幼儿以统计高效的方式将感觉线索与习得的信息结合起来:但任务的复杂性很重要。
Dev Sci. 2020 May;23(3):e12912. doi: 10.1111/desc.12912. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Bayesian Estimation with Informative Priors is Indistinguishable from Data Falsification.贝叶斯推断与信息先验具有不可分辨性。
Span J Psychol. 2019 Oct 23;22:E45. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.41.
10
Learning what to expect (in visual perception).了解预期情况(在视觉感知方面)。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Oct 24;7:668. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00668.

引用本文的文献

1
The joint estimation of uncertainty and its relationship with psychotic-like traits and psychometric schizotypy.不确定性的联合估计及其与类精神病性特质和心理测量学精神分裂症型人格的关系。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 Aug 31;4(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s44184-025-00146-6.
2
The across-trial accumulation of cardinal illusion in orientation estimation attenuates the significance of serial dependence.在方向估计中,基本错觉的跨试验累积削弱了序列依赖性的重要性。
Psychol Res. 2025 Aug 20;89(5):134. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02166-5.
3
Bayesian prior uncertainty and surprisal elicit distinct neural patterns during sound localization in dynamic environments.

本文引用的文献

1
Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex.顶叶皮质中神经元与决策相关的置信度表征。
Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):759-64. doi: 10.1126/science.1169405.
2
Understanding why patients with schizophrenia do not perceive the hollow-mask illusion using dynamic causal modelling.运用动态因果模型理解精神分裂症患者为何无法感知空心面具错觉。
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.033. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
3
Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia.
在动态环境中进行声音定位时,贝叶斯先验不确定性和意外性引发不同的神经模式。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):7931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90269-9.
4
Error fields: personalized robotic movement training that augments one's more likely mistakes.错误领域:增强个人更易出现的错误的个性化机器人运动训练。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87331-x.
5
The interplay of uncertainty, relevance and learning influences auditory categorization.不确定性、关联性和学习之间的相互作用会影响听觉分类。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86856-5.
6
No evidence for a difference in Bayesian reasoning for egocentric versus allocentric spatial cognition.没有证据表明自我中心与他心空间认知的贝叶斯推理存在差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 10;19(10):e0312018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312018. eCollection 2024.
7
Color category and inter-item interaction influence color working memory codependently.颜色类别和项目间相互作用共同影响颜色工作记忆。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.5.
8
Exploring the relationship between frequent cannabis use, belief updating under uncertainty and psychotic-like symptoms.探索频繁使用大麻、不确定性下的信念更新与类精神病症状之间的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 24;15:1309868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1309868. eCollection 2024.
9
Traveling waves shape neural population dynamics enabling predictions and internal model updating.行波塑造神经群体动力学,实现预测和内部模型更新。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 10:2024.01.09.574848. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.09.574848.
10
Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer.我们真的是贝叶斯主义者吗?概率推理显示出次优的知识迁移。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 8;20(1):e1011769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011769. eCollection 2024 Jan.
感知即相信:一种解释精神分裂症阳性症状的贝叶斯方法。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):48-58. doi: 10.1038/nrn2536. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
4
Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation?误差的相关性:是什么驱动运动适应?
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):655-64. doi: 10.1152/jn.90545.2008. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
5
Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.估计适应和泛化中运动误差的来源。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Dec;11(12):1454-61. doi: 10.1038/nn.2229. Epub 2008 Nov 16.
6
Explicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertainty.反映奖励不确定性的明确神经信号。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3801-11. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0152.
7
Decision-making with multiple alternatives.具有多个备选方案的决策
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):693-702. doi: 10.1038/nn.2123. Epub 2008 May 18.
8
The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching.人类伸手动作中适应速率的统计决定因素。
J Vis. 2008 Apr 23;8(4):20.1-19. doi: 10.1167/8.4.20.
9
Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex.前额叶皮质和扣带皮质中的选择、不确定性与价值
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):389-97. doi: 10.1038/nn2066. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
10
Movement planning with probabilistic target information.基于概率目标信息的运动规划
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;98(5):3034-46. doi: 10.1152/jn.00858.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 26.