Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):121-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Hospice care supports patients and their families physically and emotionally through the dying phase. In many countries a substantial portion of specialised end-of-life care is provided through hospices. Such care has developed outside of general healthcare and is commonly provided in a patient's home or in dedicated facilities. Hospice provision may need to increase in the future due to an ageing population with a greater need for access to end-of-life care.
In this systematic review we sought to identify the current evidence on (1) the effectiveness, including cost-effectiveness, of hospices, and hospice care in a patient's home and in nursing homes and (2) the experiences of those who use and of those who provide such services.
We included quantitative and qualitative studies on hospice care that was provided in a patient's home, nursing home or hospice. We did not include studies on end-of-life care that was provided as part of general healthcare provision, such as by general practitioners in primary care, community nurses or within general hospitals. For quantitative evaluations we included only those that compared hospice care with usual generalist healthcare. The databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched from 2003 to 2009. Evidence was assessed for quality and data extractions double-checked. For quantitative studies we present the outcome data comparing hospice versus usual care. For qualitative evaluations we organise findings thematically.
Eighteen comparative evaluations and four thematic papers were identified. Quantitative evidence, mostly of limited quality in design, showed that hospice care at home reduced general health care use and increased family and patient satisfaction with care. Main themes in the qualitative literature revealed that home hospice services support families to sustain patient care at home and hospice day care services generate for the patient a renewed sense of meaning and purpose.
Although studies had methodological limitations, in this review we found much evidence to support the benefits of hospice care. There were limited evaluations found on the impact of hospice care on psychological well-being, such as symptoms of depression, and on inpatient hospice care and non-hospital related costs.
临终关怀通过身体和情感上的支持,帮助患者及其家属度过临终阶段。在许多国家,专门的临终关怀服务有很大一部分是通过临终关怀机构提供的。这种关怀是在一般医疗保健之外发展起来的,通常在患者家中或专门的设施中提供。由于人口老龄化,需要更多的临终关怀服务,因此未来临终关怀的需求可能会增加。
本系统评价旨在确定当前关于(1)临终关怀机构和在家中、养老院中提供的临终关怀的有效性,包括成本效益,以及(2)使用这些服务的人和提供这些服务的人的体验的证据。
我们纳入了在家中、养老院或临终关怀机构提供的临终关怀的定量和定性研究。我们不包括作为一般医疗保健提供的一部分的临终关怀服务的研究,例如在初级保健中的全科医生、社区护士或综合医院提供的服务。对于定量评估,我们只纳入了将临终关怀与常规全科医生护理进行比较的研究。从 2003 年到 2009 年,我们在 CINAHL、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 The Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了检索。对证据进行了质量评估,并对数据提取进行了双重检查。对于定量研究,我们提供了将临终关怀与常规护理进行比较的结果数据。对于定性评价,我们按照主题组织发现。
确定了 18 项比较评估和 4 项专题论文。定量证据主要是设计质量有限,表明在家中的临终关怀减少了一般医疗保健的使用,并增加了家庭和患者对护理的满意度。定性文献中的主要主题揭示了家庭临终关怀服务支持家庭在家中维持患者护理,以及临终关怀日托服务为患者重新带来意义和目的感。
尽管研究存在方法学上的局限性,但在本综述中,我们发现了大量支持临终关怀益处的证据。关于临终关怀对心理健康的影响,如抑郁症状,以及对住院临终关怀和非医院相关费用的影响,我们发现的评估有限。