• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅外颈内动脉狭窄的处理:内膜切除术与血管成形术和支架置入术。

Management of stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery: endarterectomy versus angioplasty and stenting.

机构信息

Department of Neurology-Cannaday 2E, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA,

出版信息

Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2010 Nov;12(6):475-82. doi: 10.1007/s11940-010-0092-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11940-010-0092-7
PMID:20848329
Abstract

Recent randomized clinical trial data support the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Endarterectomy is more effective in preventing stroke, but this may be countered by a higher risk of perioperative myocardial infarction. Age is an important determinant in selecting patients for either carotid endarterectomy or stenting. Patients older than 70 years achieve better outcomes with endarterectomy, and younger patients achieve better outcomes with stenting. Comparative clinical and anatomic durability of endarterectomy and stenting will require additional follow-up from recently completed trials. The efficacy of carotid revascularization compared with modern medical therapy in asymptomatic patients remains an important and unanswered clinical question.

摘要

最近的随机临床试验数据支持颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状和无症状颈动脉闭塞性疾病的安全性和有效性。内膜切除术在预防中风方面更有效,但这可能会被围手术期心肌梗死的风险更高所抵消。年龄是选择颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术患者的一个重要决定因素。70 岁以上的患者接受内膜切除术的效果更好,而年轻患者接受支架置入术的效果更好。内膜切除术和支架置入术的临床和解剖耐久性比较需要从最近完成的试验中进行更多的随访。在无症状患者中,颈动脉血运重建与现代药物治疗的疗效比较仍然是一个重要且尚未解决的临床问题。

相似文献

1
Management of stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery: endarterectomy versus angioplasty and stenting.颅外颈内动脉狭窄的处理:内膜切除术与血管成形术和支架置入术。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2010 Nov;12(6):475-82. doi: 10.1007/s11940-010-0092-7.
2
Durability of Stroke Prevention with Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中的耐久性。
Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1271-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.06.041. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy: 10-year randomized trial in a community hospital.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:社区医院的 10 年随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.010.
4
Carotid endarterectomy versus angioplasty/stenting for carotid stenosis.颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术/支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007 Oct;9(4):333-40. doi: 10.1007/s11883-007-0041-4.
5
Recent advances in carotid angioplasty and stenting.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的最新进展。
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jan;11(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616637.
6
Carotid Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: What Did the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial Show and Where Do We Go From Here?颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术:颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验显示了什么,我们从这里将何去何从?
Angiology. 2017 Sep;68(8):675-682. doi: 10.1177/0003319716661661. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
7
Carotid Stent Fractures Are Not Associated With Adverse Events: Results From the ACT-1 Multicenter Randomized Trial (Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease).颈动脉支架断裂与不良事件无关:来自 ACT-1 多中心随机试验的结果(在标准风险的颈动脉内膜切除术适用人群中,对于有明显颅外颈动脉狭窄病变的无症状患者,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较)。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):49-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030030. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.
9
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub2.
10
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.新一代自膨式支架在不符合北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术(NASCET)标准的重度症状性颅外颈内动脉狭窄患者中的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39.

引用本文的文献

1
Restenosis after microsurgical non-patch carotid endarterectomy in 586 patients.586 例显微镜下非补片颈动脉内膜切除术的再狭窄。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Mar;154(3):423-31; discussion 431. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1233-9. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

本文引用的文献

1
New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS).症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入或内膜切除术治疗后 MRI 新出现的缺血性脑损伤:国际颈动脉支架研究(ICSS)的一个亚研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
2
Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.在颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中,随机分配接受血管内治疗或动脉内膜切除术的患者发生颈动脉再狭窄的长期风险:一项随机试验的长期随访
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):908-17. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70227-3. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
3
The learning curve for neuroendovascular procedures: how important is it?神经血管介入手术的学习曲线:其重要性如何?
Neurology. 2009 Jun 9;72(23):1974-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a92c6f. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
4
Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: importance of case selection.老年患者的颈动脉支架置入术:病例选择的重要性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):318-324. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21620.
5
Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1572-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028.
6
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.
7
Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中颈动脉狭窄患者的血管内治疗与手术治疗:一项随机试验。
Lancet. 2001 Jun 2;357(9270):1729-37.
8
Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors.缺血性卒中亚型:一项基于人群的发病率及危险因素研究。
Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2513-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2513.