• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临界质量对空间公共物品博弈中合作演化的影响。

Impact of critical mass on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games.

作者信息

Szolnoki Attila, Perc Matjaz

机构信息

Research Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, PO Box 49, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 May;81(5 Pt 2):057101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.057101. Epub 2010 May 4.

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.057101
PMID:20866356
Abstract

We study the evolution of cooperation under the assumption that the collective benefits of group membership can only be harvested if the fraction of cooperators within the group, i.e., their critical mass, exceeds a threshold value. Considering structured populations, we show that a moderate fraction of cooperators can prevail even at very low multiplication factors if the critical mass is minimal. For larger multiplication factors, however, the level of cooperation is highest at an intermediate value of the critical mass. The latter is robust to variations of the group size and the interaction network topology. Applying the optimal critical mass threshold, we show that the fraction of cooperators in public goods games is significantly larger than in the traditional linear model, where the produced public good is proportional to the fraction of cooperators within the group.

摘要

我们在这样的假设下研究合作的演变

只有当群体中合作者的比例,即其临界质量,超过一个阈值时,群体成员的集体利益才能实现。考虑结构化种群,我们表明,如果临界质量最小,即使在非常低的繁殖因子下,适度比例的合作者也能占优势。然而,对于较大的繁殖因子,合作水平在临界质量的中间值时最高。后者对于群体规模和交互网络拓扑结构的变化具有鲁棒性。应用最优临界质量阈值,我们表明公共物品博弈中合作者的比例显著大于传统线性模型中的比例,在传统线性模型中,所产生的公共物品与群体中合作者的比例成正比。

相似文献

1
Impact of critical mass on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games.临界质量对空间公共物品博弈中合作演化的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 May;81(5 Pt 2):057101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.057101. Epub 2010 May 4.
2
Conditional strategies and the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games.条件策略与空间公共物品博弈中合作的演化
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Feb;85(2 Pt 2):026104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.026104. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
3
Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games.噪声对空间公共品博弈中合作的拓扑无关影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Nov;80(5 Pt 2):056109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056109. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
4
Adaptive and bounded investment returns promote cooperation in spatial public goods games.适应性和有界的投资回报促进了空间公共物品博弈中的合作。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036895. Epub 2012 May 16.
5
Evolution of global cooperation driven by risks.由风险驱动的全球合作演变。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 May;85(5 Pt 2):056117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.056117. Epub 2012 May 22.
6
High thresholds encouraging the evolution of cooperation in threshold public-good games.高门槛鼓励阈限公共物品博弈中合作的进化。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5863. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62626-3.
7
Group-size effects on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game.群体规模对空间公共品博弈中合作演化的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Oct;84(4 Pt 2):047102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.047102. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
8
The effect of network topology on optimal exploration strategies and the evolution of cooperation in a mobile population.网络拓扑对移动群体中最优探索策略及合作演化的影响。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019 Oct;475(2230):20190399. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0399. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Coexistence of cooperation and defection in public goods games.公共物品博弈中的合作与背叛共存。
Evolution. 2011 Apr;65(4):1140-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01185.x. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
10
Interaction effects of cell diffusion, cell density and public goods properties on the evolution of cooperation in digital microbes.细胞扩散、细胞密度和公共物品属性对数字微生物中合作进化的相互作用影响。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Sep;27(9):1869-77. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12437. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The characteristics of average abundance function with mutation of multi-player threshold public goods evolutionary game model under redistribution mechanism.再分配机制下多人阈值公共物品演化博弈模型突变的平均丰度函数特征。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01847-0.
2
Two-dimensional adaptive dynamics of evolutionary public goods games: finite-size effects on fixation probability and branching time.进化公共品博弈的二维自适应动力学:有限规模对固定概率和分支时间的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 26;8(5):210182. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210182.
3
Synergistic third-party rewarding and punishment in the public goods game.
公共物品博弈中的协同第三方奖惩
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019 Jul;475(2227):20190349. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0349. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Divide-and-conquer Tournament on Social Networks.社交网络上的分治锦标赛
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 14;7(1):15484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15616-x.
5
When agreement-accepting free-riders are a necessary evil for the evolution of cooperation.当同意接受的搭便车者是合作进化的必要之恶时。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 30;7(1):2478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02625-z.
6
Cooperation Survives and Cheating Pays in a Dynamic Network Structure with Unreliable Reputation.在声誉不可靠的动态网络结构中,合作得以存续,作弊也有回报。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 2;6:27160. doi: 10.1038/srep27160.
7
Unfavorable Individuals in Social Gaming Networks.社交游戏网络中的不良个体。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 9;5:17481. doi: 10.1038/srep17481.
8
Group Size Effect on Cooperation in One-Shot Social Dilemmas II: Curvilinear Effect.单次社会困境中群体规模对合作的影响II:曲线效应
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 16;10(7):e0131419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131419. eCollection 2015.
9
How insurance affects altruistic provision in threshold public goods games.保险如何影响阈值公共品博弈中的利他性供给。
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 13;5:9098. doi: 10.1038/srep09098.
10
Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas.单次社会困境中群体规模对合作的影响。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 21;5:7937. doi: 10.1038/srep07937.