• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年心理发展、养育方式与儿科决策

Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles, and pediatric decision making.

作者信息

Partridge Brian C

机构信息

Kenai Peninsula College-Kachemak Bay Campus, 533 East Pioneer Ave, Homer, Alaska 99603, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):518-25. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq044. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhq044
PMID:20870933
Abstract

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child risks harm to adolescents insofar as it encourages not only poor decision making by adolescents but also parenting styles that will have an adverse impact on the development of mature decision-making capacities in them. The empirical psychological and neurophysiological data weigh against augmenting and expression of the rights of children. Indeed, the data suggest grounds for expanding parental authority, not limiting its scope. At the very least, any adequate appreciation of the moral claims regarding the authority of parents with respect to the decision-making capacity of adolescents needs to be set within an understanding of the psychological and neurophysiological facts regarding the development of adolescent decision-making capacity.

摘要

《联合国儿童权利公约》可能会对青少年造成伤害,因为它不仅鼓励青少年做出糟糕的决策,还助长了一些育儿方式,这些方式会对他们成熟决策能力的发展产生不利影响。心理学和神经生理学的实证数据不利于增强和表达儿童权利。事实上,这些数据表明有理由扩大父母的权威,而不是限制其范围。至少,在理解关于青少年决策能力发展的心理和神经生理学事实的背景下,才能充分认识到与父母对青少年决策能力的权威相关的道德主张。

相似文献

1
Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles, and pediatric decision making.青少年心理发展、养育方式与儿科决策
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):518-25. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq044. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
2
Toward a coherent account of pediatric decision making.迈向对儿科决策的连贯阐述。
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):526-52. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq039. Epub 2010 Sep 5.
3
Beyond the best interests of children: four views of the family and of foundational disagreements regarding pediatric decision making.超越儿童的最大利益:关于家庭的四种观点以及儿科决策中根本性分歧
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):499-517. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq042. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
4
Parental authority and pediatric bioethical decision making.父母权威与儿科生物伦理决策
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):553-72. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq043. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
5
Peer referencing in adolescent decision making as a function of perceived parenting style.同伴参照在青少年决策中作为感知到的父母教养方式的一项功能。
Adolescence. 2003 Winter;38(152):607-21.
6
Parenting styles and treatment of adolescents with obesity.养育方式与肥胖青少年的治疗
Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):21-8.
7
Parenting and adolescent self-regulation.养育子女与青少年的自我调节。
J Adolesc. 2004 Dec;27(6):663-76. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.01.002.
8
Parental influences on adolescent decision making and contraceptive use.父母对青少年决策和避孕措施使用的影响。
Pediatr Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):147-56, 170.
9
Individual differences in early adolescents' beliefs in the legitimacy of parental authority.青少年早期对父母权威合法性的信念的个体差异。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1353-65. doi: 10.1037/a0024050.
10
Are gains in decision-making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and china.青少年早期决策自主权的提高对情绪功能有益吗?以美国和中国为例。
Child Dev. 2009 Nov-Dec;80(6):1705-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01363.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision stability among adolescents and young adults making choices about learning genomic research results.青少年和年轻人在选择了解基因组研究结果时的决策稳定性。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e2010. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.2010.
2
Shared decision-making in adolescent healthcare: a literature review of ethical considerations.青少年保健中的共享决策:伦理考量的文献回顾。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;183(10):4195-4203. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05687-0. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Cultural and Religious Variation in Attitudes to Young People Consenting to Health Interventions.
文化和宗教因素对年轻人同意接受健康干预的态度的影响。
J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):870-890. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0686-z.
4
Navigating Decisional Discord: The Pediatrician's Role When Child and Parents Disagree.应对决策分歧:当儿童与父母意见相左时儿科医生的角色
Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0234. Epub 2017 May 12.
5
Participation of Children in Medical Decision-Making: Challenges and Potential Solutions.儿童参与医疗决策:挑战与潜在解决方案
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Dec;13(4):525-534. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9747-8. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
6
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.对于12岁及以上儿童,适用知情同意而非同意:关于儿童同意参与临床研究能力的新发现的政策影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.
7
Placebo-controlled trials in pediatrics and the child's best interest.儿科中的安慰剂对照试验与儿童的最大利益。
Ital J Pediatr. 2015 Feb 15;41:11. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0118-6.
8
Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?为何在评估儿童决策能力方面难以取得进展?
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jan 10;16:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-16-1.
9
Fuzzy trace theory and medical decisions by minors: differences in reasoning between adolescents and adults.模糊痕迹理论与未成年人的医疗决策:青少年与成年人推理过程的差异
J Med Philos. 2013 Jun;38(3):268-82. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht018. Epub 2013 Apr 19.