• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向对儿科决策的连贯阐述。

Toward a coherent account of pediatric decision making.

作者信息

Iltis Ana S

机构信息

Center for Bioethics, Health and Society and Department of Philosophy, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):526-52. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq039. Epub 2010 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhq039
PMID:20819781
Abstract

Within and among societies, there are competing understandings of the status of children, including debates over whether they can bear rights and, if so, which rights they bear and against whom, and their capacity to make decisions and be held responsible and accountable for actions. There also are different understandings of what constitutes a family; what authority parents have over and regarding their children; and what should happen to children who are without parents because of death, desertion, or imprisonment. These and other related debates reflect deep differences in worldviews, in how one understands the legitimate role of the state, in how one comes to know the proper way to raise children, and so on. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child purports to reflect international convergence on the rights of children, on how decisions concerning children should be made, and on how children ought to be treated by the state and by their parents. This paper examines whether the Convention's framework for decision making concerning children is an appropriate framework for pediatric bioethics. Questions about how to make health care decisions for children ultimately are questions of who is in authority to make and judge such decisions. Establishing who is in authority, determining whether there are any limits to that authority and, if so, defining those limits should be the focus of efforts to develop and implement a pediatric decision-making framework.

摘要

在不同社会内部和之间,对于儿童的地位存在相互竞争的理解,包括关于他们是否能够享有权利的争论,如果可以,他们享有哪些权利以及针对谁享有这些权利,以及他们做出决策以及对行为负责和承担责任的能力。对于什么构成家庭、父母对其子女拥有何种权力以及对于因死亡、遗弃或监禁而失去父母的儿童应该如何处置,也存在不同的理解。这些以及其他相关的争论反映了世界观的深刻差异,反映在人们如何理解国家的合法角色、如何认识养育子女的正确方式等等方面。《联合国儿童权利公约》旨在反映国际社会在儿童权利、关于儿童的决策应如何做出以及国家和父母应如何对待儿童等方面的共识。本文探讨《公约》中关于儿童决策的框架是否是儿科生物伦理学的适当框架。关于如何为儿童做出医疗保健决策的问题最终是谁有权做出并评判此类决策的问题。确定谁有权限、确定该权限是否有任何限制,如果有,界定这些限制应该是制定和实施儿科决策框架的努力重点。

相似文献

1
Toward a coherent account of pediatric decision making.迈向对儿科决策的连贯阐述。
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):526-52. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq039. Epub 2010 Sep 5.
2
Beyond the best interests of children: four views of the family and of foundational disagreements regarding pediatric decision making.超越儿童的最大利益:关于家庭的四种观点以及儿科决策中根本性分歧
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):499-517. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq042. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
3
Parental authority and pediatric bioethical decision making.父母权威与儿科生物伦理决策
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):553-72. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq043. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
4
Adolescent psychological development, parenting styles, and pediatric decision making.青少年心理发展、养育方式与儿科决策
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):518-25. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq044. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
5
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
8
Assent for treatment: clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practice.治疗同意:临床医生的知识、态度与实践
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):723-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2830.
9
Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective.博尔特诉博尔特案:儿科伦理学视角
J Clin Ethics. 2009 Fall;20(3):251-7.
10
The Bioethics of Children's Rights.儿童权利的生物伦理学
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2004;41(1):4-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Involving Adolescents in Decision-Making in Pediatric Organ Transplantation: A Qualitative Study in Switzerland.让青少年参与小儿器官移植决策:瑞士的一项定性研究。
Pediatr Transplant. 2025 Sep;29(6):e70146. doi: 10.1111/petr.70146.
2
When May Government Interfere with Religious Practices to Protect the Health and Safety of Children?政府何时可以干预宗教活动以保护儿童的健康和安全?
Ethics Med Public Health. 2018 Apr-Jun;5:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
Refusal of Vaccination: A Test to Balance Societal and Individual Interests.
拒绝接种疫苗:平衡社会与个人利益的考验
J Clin Ethics. 2018 Fall;29(3):206-216.
4
Cultural and Religious Variation in Attitudes to Young People Consenting to Health Interventions.文化和宗教因素对年轻人同意接受健康干预的态度的影响。
J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):870-890. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0686-z.
5
The case for HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with symptomatic sickle cell anemia.HLA 全相合同胞造血干细胞移植用于有症状的镰状细胞贫血患儿的病例分析
Blood Adv. 2017 Dec 8;1(26):2563-2567. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007708. eCollection 2017 Dec 12.
6
CHILDREN WITH MULTIPLE CONGENITAL DEFECTS: WHAT ARE THE LIMITS BETWEEN THERAPEUTIC OBSTINACY AND THE TREATMENT OF UNCERTAIN BENEFIT?患有多种先天性缺陷的儿童:治疗顽固性与疗效不确定的治疗之间的界限是什么?
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017 Jan-Mar;35(1):110-114. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;1;00004. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
An emerging field of research: challenges in pediatric decision making.一个新兴的研究领域:儿科决策中的挑战。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):403-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14546901. Epub 2014 Aug 21.