Bhalli Muhammad Asif, Khan Muhammad Qaiser, Samore Naseer Ahmed, Mehreen Sobia
Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009 Jul-Sep;21(3):32-7.
Conduction defects complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI) are frequent and associated with increased mortality and complications. Common conduction defects after acute MI are atrioventricular nodal blocks (1st, 2nd and 3rd degree) and intraventricular conduction defects (right or left bundle branch blocks and hemiblocks). In myocardial infarction occlusion of coronary arteries at different levels affects the conduction system of heart leading to various types of blocks. Conduction defects usually reflect extensive damage to the myocardium.
In this descriptive case series with non-probability purposive sampling, 345 cases of acute ST elevation myocardial Infarction were studied at Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Disease, Rawalpindi from May 2007 to May 2008. ECG was continuously observed in CCU and daily ECGs were done. Conduction defects whether transient or persistent were recorded in pre-designed proforma in addition to other clinical features and associated complications during hospital stay.
Out of 345 patients, 251 (72.8%) patients received thrombolytic therapy and 61 (17.6%) developed various types of conduction defects (Group A) and 284 had no significant conduction defects (Group B). Isolated complete atrioventricular block (AVB) at the node level occurred in 28 patients (8.1%) mainly in inferior MI. Bundle branches Blocks occurred in 32 (9.2%) patients mostly in Anterior MI. One patient (0.6%) had complete heart block at bundle branch level. All patients with complete atrioventricular block reverted to sinus rhythm except one who required permanent pacemaker. Mortality rate and clinical complications were higher in group A as compared to group B.
Conduction defects are common even in this thrombolytic era. Patients with conduction defects are at high risk of inhospital complications and mortality. They need close monitoring and optimum clinical care to reduce mortality and morbidity.
并发于急性心肌梗死(MI)的传导障碍很常见,且与死亡率和并发症增加相关。急性心肌梗死后常见的传导障碍是房室结阻滞(一度、二度和三度)和室内传导障碍(右或左束支阻滞及半阻滞)。在心肌梗死中,不同水平冠状动脉的闭塞会影响心脏传导系统,导致各种类型的阻滞。传导障碍通常反映心肌的广泛损伤。
在这个采用非概率目的抽样的描述性病例系列研究中,2007年5月至2008年5月期间,在拉瓦尔品第的武装部队心脏病学研究所/国家心脏病研究所对345例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行了研究。在冠心病监护病房持续观察心电图,并每日进行心电图检查。除了住院期间的其他临床特征和相关并发症外,还在预先设计的表格中记录传导障碍,无论其是短暂性还是持续性。
在345例患者中,251例(72.8%)接受了溶栓治疗,61例(17.6%)出现了各种类型的传导障碍(A组),284例无明显传导障碍(B组)。28例(8.1%)患者在结水平出现孤立性完全性房室阻滞(AVB),主要见于下壁心肌梗死。32例(9.2%)患者出现束支阻滞,大多见于前壁心肌梗死。1例(0.6%)患者在束支水平出现完全性心脏阻滞。除1例需要永久性起搏器外,所有完全性房室阻滞患者均恢复为窦性心律。与B组相比,A组的死亡率和临床并发症更高。
即使在这个溶栓时代,传导障碍也很常见。有传导障碍的患者发生院内并发症和死亡的风险很高。他们需要密切监测和最佳的临床护理,以降低死亡率和发病率。