• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口香糖对膀胱癌根治术后开腹或机器人手术患者肠蠕动的刺激作用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Chewing gum has a stimulatory effect on bowel motility in patients after open or robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a prospective randomized comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.042. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.042
PMID:20950844
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chewing gum during the postoperative period facilitates the recovery of bowel function and has different efficacy according to operative method used in patients with radical cystectomy.

METHODS

From July 2007 to September 2009, we randomized open radical cystectomy (ORC) patients into Group AI (ORC without gum chewing) and Group AII (ORC with gum chewing). Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) patients were randomized into Group BI (RARC without gum chewing) and Group BII (RARC with gum chewing).

RESULTS

A total of 32 ORC (17 Group AI and 15 Group AII) and 28 RARC (13 Group BI and 15 Group BII) patients were completed. The patient's perioperative data between the control (AI + BI) and chewing gum (AII + BII) group showed no differences. The median time to flatus and to bowel movement were significantly reduced in chewing gum group compared with the control patients: 57.1 vs. 69.5 hours 76.7 vs. 93.3 hours. In the ORC patients, decrease in time to flatus and bowel movement were observed in gum chewing (AII) group than control (AI) group: 64.3 vs. 80.3 hours 83.8 vs. 104.2 hours. In RARC patients, decrease in time to flatus and bowel movement were found in gum chewing (BII) group than control (BI) group: 48.8 vs. 60.3 hours 69.1 vs. 84.6 hours. No adverse effects were observed with chewing gum.

CONCLUSIONS

Chewing gum had stimulatory effects on bowel motility after cystectomy and urinary diversion. Chewing gum was safe and could be used for postoperative ileus regardless of the operative method (ORC or RARC).

摘要

目的

确定在根治性膀胱切除术后咀嚼口香糖是否有助于恢复肠道功能,并根据手术方法的不同而产生不同的疗效。

方法

2007 年 7 月至 2009 年 9 月,我们将接受开放式根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)的患者随机分为 AI 组(无口香糖咀嚼的 ORC)和 AII 组(有口香糖咀嚼的 ORC)。机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)患者随机分为 BI 组(无口香糖咀嚼的 RARC)和 BII 组(有口香糖咀嚼的 RARC)。

结果

共有 32 例 ORC(17 例 AI 组和 15 例 AII 组)和 28 例 RARC(13 例 BI 组和 15 例 BII 组)患者完成了手术。对照组(AI+BI)和咀嚼口香糖组(AII+BII)患者的围手术期数据无差异。咀嚼口香糖组患者肛门排气和排便时间中位数明显短于对照组:57.1 小时 vs. 69.5 小时;76.7 小时 vs. 93.3 小时。在 ORC 患者中,口香糖咀嚼组(AII)的肛门排气和排便时间较对照组(AI)明显缩短:64.3 小时 vs. 80.3 小时;83.8 小时 vs. 104.2 小时。在 RARC 患者中,口香糖咀嚼组(BII)的肛门排气和排便时间较对照组(BI)明显缩短:48.8 小时 vs. 60.3 小时;69.1 小时 vs. 84.6 小时。咀嚼口香糖无不良反应。

结论

咀嚼口香糖对膀胱切除术后肠道动力有刺激作用,并能促进尿路分流。无论手术方法(ORC 或 RARC)如何,咀嚼口香糖都是安全的,可用于术后肠梗阻。

相似文献

1
Chewing gum has a stimulatory effect on bowel motility in patients after open or robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a prospective randomized comparative study.口香糖对膀胱癌根治术后开腹或机器人手术患者肠蠕动的刺激作用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.042. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
2
Gum chewing stimulates bowel motility in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.咀嚼口香糖可刺激接受根治性膀胱切除术并进行尿流改道的患者的肠道蠕动。
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1053-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.048.
3
[Effect of gum chewing on bowel function recovery in patients after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion].[咀嚼口香糖对根治性膀胱切除术加尿流改道患者肠道功能恢复的影响]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Oct 18;48(5):822-824.
4
Comparison of early postoperative morbidity after robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: results of a prospective observational study.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术术后早期发病率的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究的结果。
BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113(3):458-67. doi: 10.1111/bju.12374. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Cystectomy in Recovery of Patient-Reported and Performance-Related Measures of Independence: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在患者报告的和与表现相关的独立性测量恢复方面的比较:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148329. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48329.
6
Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.随机对照试验比较开放性根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
7
Efficacy of Gum Chewing on Bowel Movement After Open Colectomy for Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.咀嚼口香糖对左侧结直肠癌开放结肠切除术后排便的影响:一项随机临床试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov;58(11):1058-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000452.
8
Is robot-assisted radical cystectomy justified in the elderly? A comparison of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly ≥75 years old.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术是否适用于老年人?比较 75 岁以上老年膀胱癌患者机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的疗效。
J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1301-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0035. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
9
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
10
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Effectiveness Study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的比较:一项多中心的有效性研究。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):609-618. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Gum Chewing in the Postoperative-Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.咀嚼口香糖在术后阶段的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jul-Aug;95(7-8):1320-1328. doi: 10.1111/ans.70238. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Evidence-based practice and future development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in urology: a multidimensional assessment based on the GRADE system.泌尿外科基于循证医学的术后加速康复(ERAS)实践与未来发展:基于GRADE系统的多维评估
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 7;19(1):358. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02506-y.
3
Integrated enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in radical cystectomy for bladder tumour-A retroprospective study.
膀胱肿瘤根治性膀胱切除术中综合强化术后康复方案——一项回顾性研究。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Oct 6;5(11):1069-1080. doi: 10.1002/bco2.438. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Impact of Preoperative Gum Chewing on Postoperative Anti-Emetic Use in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Ovarian Masses: A Prospective, Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.术前咀嚼口香糖对机器人辅助腹腔镜良性卵巢肿块手术中术后止吐药物使用的影响:一项前瞻性、单盲随机对照试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 15;60(7):1135. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071135.
5
Effects of Postoperative Gum Chewing on Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function Following Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.术后咀嚼口香糖对腹腔镜妇科手术后胃肠功能恢复的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 12;13(10):2851. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102851.
6
Transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腔与经腹膜外根治性膀胱切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0294809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294809. eCollection 2023.
7
Development of multidisciplinary, evidenced-based protocol recommendations and implementation strategies for anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery following a literature review.通过文献回顾,制定多学科、基于证据的前路腰椎体间融合术的建议方案和实施策略。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 24;102(47):e36142. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036142.
8
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术后加速康复与根治性膀胱切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Jul 29;13:535-547. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S307385. eCollection 2021.
9
Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review.根治性膀胱切除术后的短期发病率和死亡率:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e043266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266.
10
Enhanced recovery after surgery of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后患者的术后加速康复。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):2986-2996. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.44.