• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病赋能进程量表中文版的编制及心理测量学检验。

Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale: development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jan;67(1):204-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05486.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05486.x
PMID:20969618
Abstract

AIM

This paper is a report of the development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale.

BACKGROUND

In people living with diabetes, empowerment can improve metabolic and psychosocial outcomes. A scale for measuring empowerment processes can also help healthcare professionals to optimize their empowering actions and would improve their interactions with people living with diabetes.

METHOD

Based on literature reviews and interviews with people living with diabetes, a 27-item Chinese Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale was developed. Fifteen items were produced after item analysis and content validity testing. To test construct validity, concurrent validity and internal consistency, 211 outpatients living with diabetes completed the Chinese Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale, a Self-care Behaviour Scale and a Diabetes Empowerment Scale. Test-retest reliability was also analysed with 30 patients. The study was conducted in 2008 and 2009 in Taiwan.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a second-order factorial model with four subscales and 15 items best fitted the data. The four subscales were Mutual participation, Raising awareness, Providing necessary information and Open communication. Scores on the Chinese Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale correlated statistically significantly with those on the Self-care Behaviour Scale (r=0.21-0.40; P<0.01) and Diabetes Empowerment Scale (r=0.35-0.65; P<0.01). Reliability was supported by acceptable Cronbach's α (range: 0.73-0.91) and test-retest reliability scores (range: 0.75-0.83).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale has satisfactory validity and reliability for measuring the empowerment process of health professionals. Further studies are needed to test the applicability of the scale to other populations.

摘要

目的

本文旨在报告中文版糖尿病赋能进程量表的编制及心理测量学测试结果。

背景

在糖尿病患者中,赋能可以改善代谢和心理社会结局。衡量赋能进程的量表也可以帮助医护人员优化赋能行为,改善与糖尿病患者的互动。

方法

基于文献回顾和与糖尿病患者的访谈,编制了中文版糖尿病赋能进程量表,共 27 个条目。经项目分析和内容效度检验,产生 15 个条目。为检验构想效度、同时效度和内部一致性,211 名门诊糖尿病患者完成了中文版糖尿病赋能进程量表、自我护理行为量表和糖尿病赋能量表。30 名患者还进行了重测信度分析。该研究于 2008 年至 2009 年在台湾进行。

结果

验证性因子分析表明,二阶四因子模型(包含四个分量表和 15 个条目)对数据拟合度最佳。四个分量表分别是共同参与、提高意识、提供必要信息和开放沟通。中文版糖尿病赋能进程量表的得分与自我护理行为量表(r=0.21-0.40;P<0.01)和糖尿病赋能量表(r=0.35-0.65;P<0.01)显著相关。量表具有可接受的 Cronbach's α 系数(范围:0.73-0.91)和重测信度(范围:0.75-0.83)。

结论

中文版糖尿病赋能进程量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于测量医护人员的赋能进程。进一步的研究需要检验该量表在其他人群中的适用性。

相似文献

1
Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale: development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version.糖尿病赋能进程量表中文版的编制及心理测量学检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jan;67(1):204-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05486.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
2
The psychometric testing of the diabetes health promotion self-care scale.糖尿病健康促进自我护理量表的心理计量学测试。
J Nurs Res. 2012 Jun;20(2):122-30. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0b013e318254eb47.
3
Psychometric validation of an empowerment scale for Spanish-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎西班牙语患者赋权量表的心理测量学验证。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 30;20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1741-6.
4
Developing and Psychometrically Testing the Functions of Diabetes Peer Support Group Scale.糖尿病同伴支持小组量表功能的开发与心理测量学测试
J Nurs Res. 2016 Dec;24(4):357-364. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000179.
5
Scale for Measuring Role Strain in Women With Diabetes: Development and Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version.用于测量糖尿病女性角色紧张的量表:中文版的编制及心理测量学检验。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):483-490. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000688.
6
A Chinese version of the Patient Perceptions of Patient-Empowering Nurse Behaviours Scale: Reliability and validity assessment in chronically ill patients.中文版患者感知护士赋权行为量表:慢性病患者的信度和效度评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(3-4):444-457. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14613. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Development and validation of diabetes empowerment questionnaire in Iranian people with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病伊朗患者糖尿病自我管理效能感问卷的编制及信效度检验。
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Jun;60(2):267-73. doi: 10.1111/inr.12007. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
Development of a reliable and valid Chinese version of the diabetes empowerment scale.糖尿病自我管理能力量表中文版的信效度研究
Diabetes Care. 2003 Oct;26(10):2817-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2817.
9
The Chinese version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-short form.糖尿病自我管理能力简表中文版。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):258-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
10
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the coronary artery disease empowerment scale (CADES) in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.中文版冠心病患者授权量表(CADES)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的冠心病患者中的信度和效度。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04114-4.
2
Assessment tools measuring health-related empowerment in psychosocially vulnerable populations: a systematic review.评估工具测量心理社会脆弱人群的健康相关赋权:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Nov 17;20(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01585-1.
3
Non-health outcomes affecting self-care behaviors and medical decision-making preference in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.
影响 2 型糖尿病患者自我护理行为和医疗决策偏好的非健康结局:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1095-2.
4
Measuring therapeutic relationship in the care of patients with haemophilia: A scoping review.测量血友病患者护理中的治疗关系:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1208-1230. doi: 10.1111/hex.12827. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Information provision and attentive listening as determinants of patient perceptions of shared decision-making around chronic illnesses.提供信息和专注倾听作为慢性病患者对共同决策认知的决定因素。
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 22;5(1):1386. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3086-4. eCollection 2016.
6
Do Perceptions of Empowerment Affect Glycemic Control and Self-Care Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes?对赋权的认知是否会影响2型糖尿病成年人的血糖控制和自我护理?
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):80-90. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p80.
7
Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures.患者赋权评估——措施的系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0126553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126553. eCollection 2015.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Patient Perceptions of Empowerment Scale (PPES).患者赋权感知量表(PPES)中文版的心理测量学评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:867451. doi: 10.1155/2014/867451. Epub 2014 May 29.