Comparison of the rheological properties of viscosity and elasticity in two categories of soft tissue fillers: calcium hydroxylapatite and hyaluronic acid.

BACKGROUND

Two types of soft tissue filler that are in common use are those formulated primarily with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) and those with cross-linked hyaluronic acid (cross-linked HA).

OBJECTIVE

To provide physicians with a scientific rationale for determining which soft tissue fillers are most appropriate for volume replacement.

MATERIALS

Six cross-linked HA soft tissue fillers (Restylane and Perlane from Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ; Restylane SubQ from Q-Med, Uppsala, Sweden; and Juvéderm Ultra, Juvéderm Ultra Plus, and Juvéderm Voluma from Allergan, Pringy, France) and a soft tissue filler consisting of CaHA microspheres in a carrier gel containing carboxymethyl cellulose (Radiesse, BioForm Medical, Inc., San Mateo, CA). METHODS The viscosity and elasticity of each filler gel were quantified according to deformation oscillation measurements conducted using a Thermo Haake RS600 Rheometer (Newington, NH) using a plate and plate geometry with a 1.2-mm gap. All measurements were performed using a 35-mm titanium sensor at 30°C. Oscillation measurements were taken at 5 pascal tau (τ) over a frequency range of 0.1 to 10 Hz (interpolated at 0.7 Hz). Researchers chose the 0.7-Hz frequency because it elicited the most reproducible results and was considered physiologically relevant for stresses that are common to the skin. RESULTS The rheological measurements in this study support the concept that soft tissue fillers that are currently used can be divided into three groups. CONCLUSION Rheological evaluation enables the clinician to objectively classify soft tissue fillers, to select specific filler products based on scientific principles, and to reliably predict how these products will perform--lifting, supporting, and sculpting--after they are appropriately injected.