Suppr超能文献

比较双眼植入+3.00 或+4.00 屈光度附加多焦点人工晶状体后的阅读性能。

Comparison of reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00 or +4.00 diopter addition.

机构信息

Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1874-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare reading ability after cataract surgery and bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a +3.00 diopter (D) addition (add) or a +4.00 D add.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative study.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were randomly assigned to bilateral implantation of an aspheric AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal IOL with a +3.00 diopter (D) addition (add) or a +4.00 D add. The reading speed, critical print size, and reading acuity were measured binocularly with best correction using MNREAD acuity charts 6 months after surgery. Patients were tested with the chart at the best patient-preferred reading distance and at 40 cm. Binocular uncorrected and best distance-corrected visual acuities at far and near were also measured.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 32 patients. At the best reading distance, the results were similar between the 2 IOL groups in all reading parameters. When tested at 40 cm, reading speed at all print sizes from 0.3 to 0.0 (all P<.001), critical print size (P<.001), and reading acuity (P = .014) were statistically significantly better in the +3.00 D IOL group than in the +4.00 D IOL group. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at far and near were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Although the 2 IOL groups had similar performance in reading parameters, patients had to adjust to their best reading distance. The +3.00 D IOL performed better than the +4.00 D IOL at 40 cm.

摘要

目的

比较白内障术后双眼植入+3.00 屈光度(D)附加或+4.00 D 附加多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)后的阅读能力。

地点

巴西圣保罗大学眼科系。

设计

前瞻性比较研究。

方法

计划行白内障手术的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受具有+3.00 D 附加的非球面 AcrySof ReSTOR 多焦点 IOL 或+4.00 D 附加的双眼植入。术后 6 个月,使用 MNREAD 视力表在最佳矫正下,双眼测量阅读速度、临界印刷尺寸和阅读视力。患者在最佳患者喜好阅读距离和 40 cm 处用图表进行测试。还测量了双眼未矫正和最佳远距离矫正的远距和近距视力。

结果

该研究共纳入 32 名患者。在最佳阅读距离时,两组 IOL 在所有阅读参数上的结果相似。当在 40 cm 处测试时,所有印刷尺寸(0.3 至 0.0)的阅读速度(均 P<.001)、临界印刷尺寸(P<.001)和阅读视力(P =.014)在+3.00 D IOL 组均显著优于+4.00 D IOL 组。两组远距和近距未矫正和矫正视力相似。

结论

尽管两组 IOL 在阅读参数上表现相似,但患者需要适应其最佳阅读距离。与+4.00 D IOL 相比,+3.00 D IOL 在 40 cm 处的表现更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验