Department of Internal Medicine, Bnai-Zion Hospital, Israel.
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.029. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
Our study aimed to develop a framework to improve communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients.
Following a modified Delphi process, we developed preliminary recommendations regarding communication between physicians and CAM practitioners. We then surveyed 473 physicians and 781 CAM practitioners regarding their opinions on these recommendations.
High reliability and validity of the survey were found among the physicians and CAM practitioners (Cronbach's alpha score of .94 and .83, respectively). Physicians and CAM practitioners considered communication regarding mutual patients important (80% and 97%, respectively; P<.001). A medical/referral letter was the preferred communication mode. Physicians and CAM practitioners concurred on four elements that should be included in such a referral letter: conventional-CAM diagnosis with coherent terminology, possible conventional-CAM treatment interactions, description of the treatment plan and its goals, and quality issues regarding CAM supplements.
A practical framework for advancing physician-CAM practitioner communication is feasible, and may be applied in daily medical care with the goal of bridging the patient-physician-CAM practitioner communication gap.
Communication between physicians and CAM practitioners regarding mutual patients is important. Establishing a framework for the mode and content of such communication is feasible.
本研究旨在制定一个框架,以改善医生和补充与替代医学(CAM)从业者之间关于共同患者的沟通。
我们采用改良 Delphi 法制定了关于医生和 CAM 从业者之间沟通的初步建议,然后对 473 名医生和 781 名 CAM 从业者进行了调查,了解他们对这些建议的看法。
在医生和 CAM 从业者中发现了调查的高度可靠性和有效性(Cronbach's alpha 分数分别为.94 和.83)。医生和 CAM 从业者均认为关于共同患者的沟通很重要(分别为 80%和 97%;P<.001)。医疗/转诊信是首选的沟通方式。医生和 CAM 从业者在转诊信中应包含的四个要素上达成一致:具有连贯术语的常规-CAM 诊断、可能的常规-CAM 治疗相互作用、治疗计划及其目标的描述以及 CAM 补充剂的质量问题。
推进医生-CAM 从业者沟通的实用框架是可行的,并可应用于日常医疗保健,以弥合医患-CAM 从业者沟通差距。
医生和 CAM 从业者之间关于共同患者的沟通很重要。建立这种沟通的模式和内容的框架是可行的。