Brinton E A, Eisenberg S, Breslow J L
Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics and Metabolism, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021.
J Clin Invest. 1990 Jan;85(1):144-51. doi: 10.1172/JCI114405.
Diets that reduce atherosclerosis risk lower levels of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), but the significance of this is unclear. To better understand the mechanism of this phenomenon we studied the turnover of HDL apolipoproteins A-I and A-II in 13 subjects on two contrasting metabolic diets. Upon changing from high to low intake of saturated fat and cholesterol the mean HDL-C decreased 29% from 56 +/- 13 (SD) to 40 +/- 10 mg/dl, while apo A-I levels fell 23% from 139 +/- 22 to 107 +/- 22 mg/dl (both P less than 0.001). Mean apo A-II levels did not change. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of apo A-I increased 11% from 0.228 +/- 0.048 to 0.254 +/- 0.063 pools/d, while its absolute transport rate (TR) decreased 14% from 12.0 +/- 2.7 to 10.3 +/- 3.4 mg/kg per d (both P = 0.005). The decrease in HDL-C and apo A-I levels correlated with the decrease in apo A-I TR (r = 0.79 and 0.83, respectively; P less than 0.001), but not with the increase in apo A-I FCR (r = -0.04 and -0.02, respectively). In contrast, within each diet the HDL-C and apo A-I levels were inversely correlated with apo A-I FCR both on the high-fat (r = -0.85 and -0.77, P less than 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively) and low-fat diets (r = -0.67 and -0.48, P = 0.012 and 0.098, respectively) but not with apo A-I TR. In summary, diet-induced changes in HDL-C levels correlate with and may result from changes in apo A-I TR. In contrast, differences in HDL-C levels between people on a given diet correlate with and may result from differences in apo A-I FCR. Therefore, the mechanism of dietary effects on HDL levels differs substantially from the mechanism explaining the differences in levels between individuals on a fixed diet. In assessing coronary heart disease risk, it may be inappropriate to conclude that diet-induced decreases in HDL are equivalent to low HDL within a given diet.
降低动脉粥样硬化风险的饮食会降低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平,但其意义尚不清楚。为了更好地理解这一现象的机制,我们在13名受试者身上研究了两种截然不同的代谢饮食下HDL载脂蛋白A-I和A-II的周转率。从高饱和脂肪和胆固醇摄入量转变为低摄入量后,平均HDL-C从56±13(标准差)降至40±10mg/dl,下降了29%,而载脂蛋白A-I水平从139±22降至107±22mg/dl,下降了23%(两者P均小于0.001)。平均载脂蛋白A-II水平未发生变化。载脂蛋白A-I的分解代谢率(FCR)从0.228±0.048池/天增加了11%至0.254±0.063池/天,而其绝对转运率(TR)从12.0±2.7降至10.3±3.4mg/kg per d,下降了14%(两者P = 0.005)。HDL-C和载脂蛋白A-I水平的降低与载脂蛋白A-I的TR降低相关(r分别为0.79和0.83;P小于0.001),但与载脂蛋白A-I的FCR增加无关(r分别为-0.04和-0.02)。相反,在每种饮食中,无论高脂(r分别为-0.85和-0.77,P分别小于0.001和0.002)还是低脂饮食(r分别为-0.67和-0.48,P分别为0.012和0.098),HDL-C和载脂蛋白A-I水平均与载脂蛋白A-I的FCR呈负相关,但与载脂蛋白A-I的TR无关。总之,饮食诱导的HDL-C水平变化与载脂蛋白A-I的TR变化相关且可能由其引起。相比之下,给定饮食人群中HDL-C水平的差异与载脂蛋白A-I的FCR差异相关且可能由其引起。因此,饮食对HDL水平的影响机制与解释固定饮食个体间HDL水平差异的机制有很大不同。在评估冠心病风险时,得出饮食诱导的HDL降低等同于给定饮食中HDL水平低的结论可能并不合适。