• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析生物和非生物概念的语义表达:一项规范性研究。

Analysis of the semantic representations of living and nonliving concepts: A normative study.

机构信息

IRCCS S. Lucia, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006;23(4):515-40. doi: 10.1080/02643290542000067.

DOI:10.1080/02643290542000067
PMID:21049342
Abstract

Current feature-based semantic memory models assume that the semantic representations of concepts differ systematically across living and nonliving categories and that such differences account for the emergence of category-specific semantic deficits in brain-damaged people. To assess some of the different models' main assumptions about structural differences at the semantic feature level in the two major semantic domains, we administrated a feature-listing task to normal young volunteers on 64 concepts drawn from living and nonliving semantic categories. We investigated whether feature correlation, a variable with a crucial role in the emergence of category-specific deficits, should be computed as a concept-dependent or as a concept-independent measure, and we chose the former. We also addressed the issue of a psychological counterpart of feature production frequency. Finally, we analysed the database obtained from the feature-listing tasks, looked at cross-domain differences for correlation, feature frequency, distinctiveness, and feature type, and discussed the implications of these findings for current semantic memory models.

摘要

目前基于特征的语义记忆模型假设,概念的语义表示在生物和非生物类别之间存在系统差异,并且这种差异解释了脑损伤患者出现特定于类别的语义缺陷的原因。为了评估不同模型关于两个主要语义领域语义特征水平结构差异的主要假设,我们向 64 名正常年轻志愿者进行了特征列表任务,这些概念取自生物和非生物语义类别。我们调查了特征相关性,作为特定于类别的缺陷出现的关键变量,是否应该作为依赖于概念的还是独立于概念的度量来计算,我们选择了前者。我们还解决了特征生成频率的心理对应物的问题。最后,我们分析了特征列表任务获得的数据库,研究了相关性、特征频率、独特性和特征类型的跨域差异,并讨论了这些发现对当前语义记忆模型的意义。

相似文献

1
Analysis of the semantic representations of living and nonliving concepts: A normative study.分析生物和非生物概念的语义表达:一项规范性研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006;23(4):515-40. doi: 10.1080/02643290542000067.
2
Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts.典型性、独特性和相关性:对生物和非生物概念的语义属性的分析。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Mar 1;18(2):125-74. doi: 10.1080/02643290125857.
3
Longitudinal profiles of semantic impairment for living and nonliving concepts in dementia of Alzheimer's type.阿尔茨海默病型痴呆中关于有生命和无生命概念的语义损伤纵向概况。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;13(7):892-909. doi: 10.1162/089892901753165818.
4
Semantic relevance and semantic disorders.语义相关性和语义障碍。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):439-52. doi: 10.1162/089892904322926773.
5
Semantic processing of living and nonliving concepts across the cerebral hemispheres.大脑两半球对生物和非生物概念的语义加工
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 28.
6
Feature type effects in semantic memory: an event related potentials study.语义记忆中的特征类型效应:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2005 Dec 30;390(3):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.015. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
7
The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia.语义距离在生物类别特异性损伤中的作用:来自一例语义性痴呆的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1017-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.006. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
8
Semantic category differences in cross-form priming.跨形式启动中的语义类别差异。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Jul;9(5):796-805. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703950120.
9
A case of prevailing deficit of nonliving categories or a case of prevailing sparing of living categories?更倾向于非生物范畴缺失还是更倾向于生物范畴保留?
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Feb 1;18(1):39-70. doi: 10.1080/02643290042000035.
10
Evaluating feature-category relations using semantic fluency tasks.使用语义流畅性任务评估特征-类别关系。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Jul;58(2):202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.11.004.

引用本文的文献

1
From semantic knowledge to semantic features: French semantic feature production norms for 360 concepts.从语义知识到语义特征:360个概念的法语语义特征生成规范
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 10;57(10):282. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02814-z.
2
Better Together: Integrating Multivariate with Univariate Methods, and MEG with EEG to Study Language Comprehension.协同共进:整合多变量与单变量方法,以及将脑磁图与脑电图结合用于研究语言理解
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024;39(8):991-1019. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2223783. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Overestimation of Phonological Judgments on the Right Side of Space.
对空间右侧语音判断的高估。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 25;13(8):1123. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081123.
4
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
5
Predicting coarse-grained semantic features in language comprehension: evidence from ERP representational similarity analysis and Chinese classifier.语言理解中粗粒度语义特征的预测:来自 ERP 表象相似性分析和汉语分类器的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8312-8320. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad116.
6
New Spanish semantic feature production norms for older adults.针对老年人的新西班牙语语义特征生成规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):970-986. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01660-z. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.神经证据表明语言理解过程中可预测生物性特征:来自 MEG 和 EEG 表象相似性分析的证据。
J Neurosci. 2020 Apr 15;40(16):3278-3291. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1733-19.2020. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words (ItAoA).大量词汇的意大利语习得年龄规范(ItAoA)。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278. eCollection 2019.
9
What matters in semantic feature processing for persons with stroke-aphasia: Evidence from an auditory concept-feature verification task.中风失语症患者语义特征处理中的关键因素:来自听觉概念特征验证任务的证据。
Aphasiology. 2014;28(7):823-839. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.913769. Epub 2014 May 20.
10
Verbal Description of Concrete Objects: A Method for Assessing Semantic Circumlocution in Persons With Aphasia.具体物体的言语描述:一种评估失语症患者语义迂回的方法。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S828-37. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0154.