Wang Lin, Kuperberg Gina R
Department of Psychiatry and the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024;39(8):991-1019. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2223783. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
We used MEG and EEG to examine the effects of Plausibility ( vs. ) and Animacy ( vs. ) on activity to incoming words during language comprehension. We conducted univariate event-related and multivariate spatial similarity analyses on both datasets. The univariate and multivariate results converged in their time course and sensitivity to Plausibility. However, only the spatial similarity analyses detected effects of Animacy. The MEG and EEG findings largely converged between 300-500ms, but diverged in their univariate and multivariate responses to the anomalies between 600-1000ms. We interpret the full set of results within a predictive coding framework. In addition to the theoretical significance of these findings, we discuss the methodological implications of the convergence and divergence between the univariate and multivariate results, as well as between the MEG and EEG results. We argue that a deeper understanding of language processing can be achieved by integrating different analysis approaches and techniques.
我们使用脑磁图(MEG)和脑电图(EEG)来研究合理性(与……相对)和生动性(与……相对)对语言理解过程中对传入单词的活动的影响。我们对这两个数据集都进行了单变量事件相关分析和多变量空间相似性分析。单变量和多变量结果在其时程和对合理性的敏感性方面趋于一致。然而,只有空间相似性分析检测到了生动性的影响。脑磁图和脑电图的结果在300 - 500毫秒之间基本一致,但在600 - 1000毫秒之间对异常情况的单变量和多变量反应有所不同。我们在预测编码框架内解释了整套结果。除了这些发现的理论意义外,我们还讨论了单变量和多变量结果之间以及脑磁图和脑电图结果之间趋同和差异的方法学意义。我们认为,通过整合不同的分析方法和技术,可以更深入地理解语言处理。